dmccread at MACH1.WLU.CA
Tue Sep 12 02:22:44 MDT 1995
On Thu, 7 Sep 1995, Willaim Thurber - PhD Student wrote:
> I learned last week to leave the economic number crunching to Dr.
> McCready. My impression is that GP's actually make more than many
> specialists but I'll leave those numbers to him.
Depends on the specialty - generally they make more than GPs but
we have far fewer than does the US.
> > Still, the amount of tax that I would end up paying is still going to
> > be much more than you do. What I pay now only supports those eligible
> > for benefits. Add the rest of the USA's population, and like it or
> > not, taxes needed to pay even for minimal health care will be excessiv
Agreed - this is a problem because the level of health care is
significantly higher - thus if you wish to keep taxes low, you have to
cut the availability of health care significantly including research
(which is what Canada has done).
> But you now pay tax plus premiums, Did the GAO address the total cost
> to the consumer or just pass judgement on the current tax burden.
The tax burden plus premiums depends on what ones income is - in
the example I gave in a previous post about my taxes being so much lower
in the US, I could buy five health insurance policies for the tax
difference - now for a low income person, they would be better off with
the tax without premiums. I dare say you as a graduate student would be
better off in Canada.
More information about the Rushtalk