raostrea at IX.NETCOM.COM
Tue Sep 26 13:06:10 MDT 1995
>You have a very well thought out position. I would like to know who
>backed that is an anti-gunner. I don't recall hearing or reading
>the sort. So any details would be appreciative. By the way I hope
>wrong here. Geez, you sound as cynical as I do.
I didn't say they backed an anti-gunner, Darin, or else my point would
be proven outright! I am developing a cynical attitude towards
organizations that have a one-issue agenda (from both the left and the
>You don't say. If the gov't required it, the enrollment would
>have no doubt of it. :) You don't need the gov't to show you how to
>care of your own gun.
No, but if the government had a national campaign promoting/encouraging
enrollment in gun training/safety courses (when pigs fly, I know) I do
believe enrollment would soar because of the IMPRESSION society would
get from such a campaign....
There's plenty of people who know how who can pass
>that information along. What next? Mandated classes in how to mow
>lawn? Many people get hurt with those things every year. Maybe we
>just wrap styrofoam pads around everything so no one will get hurt.
>make those lawyers too happy though. :)
Unless, of course, you develop an allergic reaction to the styrofoam!
>Hey everybody send Robert a quarter, he'll do the study. (Robert:
>said how MUCH we had to pay:))
Well, the MORE you pay, the more you'll see what you WANT to see in my
Robert A. Ostrea, Jr.
North Hollywood, CA
RAOstrea at ix.netcom.com
DODGERS IN FIRST PLACE!!!!!!
More information about the Rushtalk