A Reality Check
safrye at CONCENTRIC.NET
Tue Feb 24 08:51:26 MST 1998
>I don't know anyone that is saying it is not true now. I may have missed it
>but clinton has the support of none of the above so he shouldn't do
>anything if that is the criteria. Bush did was was agreed to. However,
>clinton seems bent on having the US act alone and if that is the case then
>the only thing that makes sense is to go the whole route and cut out the
>cancer or do nothing. You may not want your son dieing so some one can save
>face but what if it means stopping a maniac from killing thousands, slowly
>with a toxin?
How do you guarantee that result - short of total annihilation? Your
previous post claims he has moved everything.
I don't have an answer, but the ones I have seen here are just calls for
action with no good odds of result. If someone comes up with a reasonable
plan - with good chances of success, fine.
More information about the Rushtalk