Smear or Enlightenment
Stephen A. Frye
safrye at CONCENTRIC.NET
Thu Sep 14 15:05:10 MDT 2000
>finance reform, a near total lie as far as I can tell. A smear tactic, by
>definition is an attempt to destroy the reputation of or vilify. It
>assumes the person is reputable in the first place.
I don't believe it makes that assumption at all. And truthful or not, I
believe it is a step down the slippery slope to a campaign resembling
Dianne Feinstein and Michael Huffington. Also, truthful or not, I do not
believe the voting public will look at it objectively. The voting public
will see it as smear and personal attack, and I believe it will sour many
who may be on the fence.
>levels; and then repeatedly lied about it. To say this should not enter
>into a campaign is to basically allow corruption to run politics and
>government (which it already does).
You are right. Corruption does indeed run politics.
More information about the Rushtalk