Smear or Enlightenment
raythomas101 at HOTMAIL.COM
Thu Sep 14 17:39:53 MDT 2000
So only Gore should be allowed to use "smear tactics?"
RAY THOMA$, Moderator
Forced Altruism List
forcedaltruism at topica.com
Read my regular features (two of 'em) at "Sierra Times."
Go to: http://www.SierraTimes.com
>From: "Stephen A. Frye" <safrye at concentric.net>
>Reply-To: Open discussion of current events <RUSHTALK at hermes.csdco.com>
>To: RUSHTALK at hermes.csdco.com
>Subject: Re: Smear or Enlightenment
>Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:05:10 -0700
> >finance reform, a near total lie as far as I can tell. A smear tactic,
> >definition is an attempt to destroy the reputation of or vilify. It
> >assumes the person is reputable in the first place.
>I don't believe it makes that assumption at all. And truthful or not, I
>believe it is a step down the slippery slope to a campaign resembling
>Dianne Feinstein and Michael Huffington. Also, truthful or not, I do not
>believe the voting public will look at it objectively. The voting public
>will see it as smear and personal attack, and I believe it will sour many
>who may be on the fence.
> >levels; and then repeatedly lied about it. To say this should not enter
> >into a campaign is to basically allow corruption to run politics and
> >government (which it already does).
>You are right. Corruption does indeed run politics.
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
More information about the Rushtalk