Democrats Against Military Tribunals?

carl william spitzer iv cwsiv_2nd at JUNO.COM
Sun Dec 2 14:14:42 MST 2001

The responce to such arkancides would be open use of the second amendment
for which purpose it was written.  Even at 100 to 1 the elitists would
run out of lives before we did.


On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:44:24 -0700 Jim <jnantz at INFICAD.COM> writes:
>I don't want them to have a trial in this country because it will turn
>a media circus.  Lawyers of the ilk that defended OJ would rush to the
>defense of these people.  Trials in our court system would take
>years.  Some of these people would probably die of old age before the
>mess would be finished.  Then there would be the 25 or 30 years of
>The only reservation I have about these military trials for non
>citizens is
>that I can imagine somebody like Clinton or Reno saying a political
>of theirs isn't a citizen, arresting him, putting him on trial in
>and shoot him.  It would make Arkancides legal.  All they'd have to
>say is
>we didn't know he wasn't a citizen.

Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list