wbwhite at MADBBS.COM
Sun Dec 9 13:01:57 MST 2001
In the recent movie, the sneak attack at Pearl Harbor looked like shooting
fish in a barrel. What exempt status should be accorded to soldiers who
strike a people without provocation and without warning? Being under
orders, does not always grant soldiers immunity from consequences of
their actions as the post WW II Nuremberg trials demonstrated. Clearly
these Japanese individuals who so happily shot our people have not been,
nor apparently will they be, brought to account for their perfidy. This
immunity must have been worked out at high levels of command. I don't
like it, however, and I certainly would not welcome them, unrepentant and
unshriven to the memorial.
"Dudley D. Doright" wrote:
> They were also Soldiers following orders.
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 19:45:00 -0600 Richard A Whitenight
> <rum.runner at JUNO.COM> writes:
> > I suspect there is a little thing called "Statute of Limitations" and
> > it
> > would be a tad politically incorrect for any governent.
> > Richard
> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:19:31 +0000 wbwhite <wbwhite at MADBBS.COM>
> > writes:
> > > I just read about the Japanese pilots who bombed Pearl Harbor in
> > a
> > > secret attack and returned for the anniversary. Why weren't
> > > these
> > > pilots apprehended and brought to justice?
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
More information about the Rushtalk