telemarketer law

Jim Nantz jnantz2 at GETNET.NET
Thu Jul 3 20:01:35 MDT 2003


At 01:05 PM 7/3/2003 -0700, Stephen wrote:
>I am totally NOT in favor of charging for email, but it would sure stop a
>lot of this.

I never said charge for email.  Assume that XYZ inc is paying someone to
send spam and hiding its origin and not including a valid email address so
that people can replay and demand to be taken off the list.  Ban U.S.
credit card companies from sending any money to XYZ inc.  The dishonest
businesses that pay someone to send spam depend on people giving them their
credit card numbers to pay for the viagra, tool enlarging pills, or
whatever.  If they cannot get money from MasterCard of PayPal, they're
going to see a serious drop in sales.



More information about the Rushtalk mailing list