wbwhite at MADBBS.COM
Sun Jul 6 20:59:04 MDT 2003
I, too, found this disturbingly ironic. I'm sure there is a torturously
convoluted explanation there somewhere.
Jim Nantz wrote:
> At 06:51 PM 7/6/2003 -0400, Wbwhite wrote:
> >One of these was the capture-Iraqi-oil-argument (an argument
> >favored and lambasted BTW by my brother who owns Exxon stock).
> If he really believes this, why does he still own the stock? That would be
> like me believing that it's wrong to use tobacco but owning stock in
> Phillip Morris, or believing that prostitution is wrong but owning a share
> of a Nevada whorehouse.
More information about the Rushtalk