Gephardt's Elephant

John A. Quayle blueoval at SGI.NET
Thu May 8 20:45:09 MDT 2003

Gephardt's elephant
Robert Novak 

May 8, 2003 | 
Print | 


WASHINGTON -- A focused moment in last Saturday night's discursive debate 
in Columbia, S.C., by nine Democratic presidential hopefuls came when Sen. 
John Edwards, his once high hopes fading fast, took dead aim at the 
proposal that has generated momentum for Rep. Richard Gephardt's candidacy. 
By raising taxes to pay for universal health care, said Edwards, Gephardt 
"is taking almost a trillion dollars out of the pocket of working families 
making $30,000 or $40,000 a year."

None of the other candidates likes the Gephardt plan, mainly because the 
incipient campaign's first new idea came from somebody else. Only Edwards, 
however, admitted there was an elephant on the stage at the University of 
South Carolina: a tax increase for a $40,000-a-year family of four that 
eventually would cost it at least $1,600 a year. That admission would 
undermine the Democratic line of President Bush's tax cuts benefiting only 
the rich.

The dilemma for Dick Gephardt is intense. Freed from the eight-year burden 
of leading the minority House Democrats, he looks more like the fresh-faced 
St. Louis Alderman elected to Congress in 1976. At this very early stage, 
he is becoming a front-runner for the presidential nomination. Yet, the 
plan that has propelled him to the head of the pack would be a heavy burden 
to carry against George W. Bush.

This is a brand new Gephardt position. On NBC's "Meet the Press" Jan. 27, 
2002, as he prepared another failed campaign to make him speaker of the 
House, Gephardt resisted moderator Tim Russert's interrogation about 
rolling back Bush tax cuts. "I just don't see any sense," he said, in 
bucking the president's adamant position. On Feb. 23, 2003, after another 
losing election, he gave Russert the same answer: "I'm not one who tilts at 

Two months later, Gephardt changed his mind. To finance government funding 
for business-provided health care, he would roll back Bush tax cuts passed 
by Congress in 2001 -- including those that have already taken effect.

This is heavy going for that $40,000-a-year family of four. Gephardt would 
return the present 10 percent tax rate on $12,000 of income back to 15 
percent, costing this family $600 a year. The child tax credit would return 
to $500 from $700 in 2005 and its gradual increase to $1,000 in 2010. That 
increases taxes $400 immediately for the two-child family, rising to $1,000 
in 2010. The total tax increase would be at least $1,600 in 2010, not 
counting other tax breaks ended by Gephardt. The extra taxes paid over six 
years, starting with President Gephardt's first year, total $6,800. If this 
family's breadwinners work for a company that now provides health care, 
they get only pain from Gephardt.

Bush's opponents can make a debatable argument that voiding future tax cuts 
does not constitute increased taxes, but they cannot credibly make the same 
claim about repealing the 10 percent tax rate and the $600 tax credit now 
in effect. Yet, only Edwards among Gephardt's rivals admits the elephant is 

Rep. Ellen Tauscher of California, a successful businesswoman and strong 
supporter of Sen. Joe Lieberman's candidacy, was asked on CNN's "Crossfire" 
Monday whether Lieberman agreed that repealing the Bush tax cut would be a 
tax increase. "No," she replied quickly, "he does not agree with that." 
Requests for an answer from Lieberman were unavailing, but the question 
cannot be avoided if Gephardt is the nominee.

Gephardt's prospective road is promising. He can win the caucuses next Jan. 
19 in Iowa, repeating his 1988 victory there. That could push him to a 
respectable finish in New Hampshire Jan. 27 (where Sen. John Kerry of 
neighboring Massachusetts is heavily favored). Gephardt would all but 
clinch the nomination by winning Feb. 3 in South Carolina, where his friend 
and colleague -- Rep. James Clyburn, the state's only black congressman -- 
controls 20 to 25 percent of the Democratic primary vote.

Neutral Democratic strategists, while admiring Gephardt's candidacy, 
privately suggest he must amend his proposal so that it does not increase 
tax rates now in effect. That is patently impossible, without wrecking the 
whole scheme. The candidate surging toward the Democratic presidential 
nomination is advocating higher taxes on ordinary Americans, and no 
campaign spin can alter that reality.

©2003 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Robert Novak | <>Read 
his biography

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 134524b.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1438 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 134525c.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 633 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 134525f.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7774 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1345267.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 12330 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
-------------- next part --------------

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
Version: 6.0.476 / Virus Database: 273 - Release Date: 4/24/2003

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list