The Food Police Re-Emerge..............
Stephen A. Frye
s.frye at VERIZON.NET
Tue May 13 10:40:05 MDT 2003
This is another (I hope) totally bogus law suit - from California or
anywhere. Parents are well aware that these foods (and I use that word in
the loosest of senses) are garbage. But in moderation, I would have to
believe (and, as John would say, bet the rent) that they are harmless. I
eat them - I even over indulge sometimes. I eat a lot of things. And my
cholesterol is still below 160. My resting heart rate is about 50 or 51,
my blood pressure is really good. I treat, but I eat - on the whole - a
really balanced diet - BY CHOICE! It's all in dosage, moderation, COMMON
SENSE! Lordie, lordie - if we could only legislate that!
I have to bet that this goober of an attorney is acting on behalf of
someone, and that he stands to make a profit. It's just noise. I don't
believe this will get any further than the first judge who sees it. I
think (not sure) that the McDonalds suit made it just about as far.
At 09:02 AM 5/13/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>I read about this this morning. If this guy wins I hope Nabisco places ads
>on billboards all over the state saying:
>"Due to the recent lawsuit, we will no longer be selling any of our cookie
>products in California. Also to avoid any legal trouble in the future we
>will be closing any facilities we have in the state where our cookies are
>made. Also we will no longer ship any of our cookie products into the
>state of California."
>I was listening to Quinn a few months ago when he was commenting on some
>scheme in Massachusetts where Home Depot was being harassed by the state
>government. He said Home Depot should have closed all their stores in the
>state instead of bending over for the state officials. If Nabisco is
>going to face this kind of crap, then they should consider not selling
>their cookies in California. Any made there should only be sent out of state.
More information about the Rushtalk