A liberal's response a year later.
wbwhite at MADBBS.COM
Sun Apr 11 21:30:47 MDT 2004
Also, many people have large gaps in their experience levels. A few
years ago, near Albany, NY, I was riding in a van with several university
type PhD's. We had a flat tire. They had no idea what to do. I changed
the tire, lickity crack, as they looked on sort of amazed. My guess is
that these folks are the same types who don't get the terrorism threat or
what to do about it. Too far out of their ken.
Steven Laib wrote:
> Here is my two cents:
> What I've seen is that there are a lot of people who think terrorism is
> result of something bad they have done, or of something bad their
> has done. They don't understand that there are bad people out there
> who like
> to blow people up for fun, or for political reasons that have little or
> nothing to do
> with the reality of the situation. Kind of like those idiots in Spain
> who reacted
> by trying to put their collective heads in the sand and hoping the
> will go away.
> I've been reading Barnett on "The Pentagon's New Map" recently for a
> book review.
> While I don't completely agree with him, what I see is that the
> "primatives" (my word)
> out there do pose a threat, and a lot of people don't understand that
> because they have been
> living in relative security for too long. They also tend to think of
> the US as the danger because
> we are strong. They don't understand the idea of responsibility well
> at all, largely because
> they have been abdicating it in favor of letting Uncle Sam do it for
> too long. So, they fear
> their protector more than the bully. It makes no sense, but I don't
> expect it too. It is
> built on emotionalism, not intellect.
> On Sunday, April 11, 2004, at 09:11 PM, wbwhite wrote:
> > Right. The situation reminds me of the movie, Restoration, in
> > which the
> > king says to the dissolute doctor, "The plague is coming, Merrival; the
> > plague wakes people up."
> > Bill
> > Jim wrote:
> >> I don't know. I guess a year or so from now I'll find out. I
> >> thought it
> >> interesting that he took a year to respond. He must have seen the
> >> recent
> >> events and thought he had something to crow about. I suspect he will
> >> end
> >> up doing little more than chant. Although he's from England, I doubt
> >> he's
> >> read Animal Farm. His grandparents lived through WW2. He and his
> >> parents
> >> had lived their lives with IRA bombs going off all the time in public
> >> places. If after all that he doesn't understand the threat of
> >> terrorism
> >> and the need to deal with it, there's no hope for him.
> >> At 08:35 PM 4/10/2004, you wrote:
> >>> You've given him a heavy dose of what is so. Will he be able to use
> >>> the
> >>> information, or will he simply chant, "Four legs good; two legs
> >>> bad"?
> >>> Bill
More information about the Rushtalk