Softening on eminent Domain?
dap1 at BELLSOUTH.NET
Mon Jul 25 17:36:59 MDT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 02:45 PM 7/25/2005, you wrote:
>Oops! Sorry Dennis if it didn't follow on the lines of "proper" use of
>eminent domain it might have been because I wasn't leading that way; It's
>just ONE MORE example of the law being applied the way the one applying it
>Instead of just taking his land for private use here they have a valid
>public use - but pay double since it is a politically connected individual...
>Didn't mean to confuse !
But you did confuse. The law is being applied exactly as intended as far as
I can see (again the questionable offer not withstanding). What am I missing?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Rushtalk