Softening on eminent Domain?

Dennis Putnam dap1 at BELLSOUTH.NET
Mon Jul 25 17:36:59 MDT 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At 02:45 PM 7/25/2005, you wrote:
>Oops! Sorry Dennis if it didn't follow on the lines of "proper" use of 
>eminent domain it might have been because I wasn't leading that way; It's 
>just ONE MORE example of the law being applied the way the one applying it 
>wants...
>
>Instead of just taking his land for private use here they have a valid 
>public use - but pay double since it is a politically connected individual...
>
>Didn't mean to confuse !
>Charlie
>

But you did confuse. The law is being applied exactly as intended as far as 
I can see (again the questionable offer not withstanding). What am I missing?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBQuV3mv34lmKmdrVUEQKStQCg5LrmGIoavCRNloNzwHZICsC+g0AAoP6Z
BnFM5t+W3NrgkenOH1Jpn2ZU
=HKoP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Rushtalk mailing list