SCOTUS

Thomas Matiska tom.matiska at ATT.NET
Mon Sep 5 08:43:18 MDT 2005


Extra Partinsanship does have entertainment value.  Wouldn't the nomination of Bork or Ken Starr be a nice distraction right about now? 

Tom


-------------- Original message from Dennis Putnam <dap1 at BELLSOUTH.NET>: -------------- 


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- 
> Hash: SHA1 
> 
> Promote Clarence Thomas, which I don't think requires Senate approval, then 
> appoint a new justice. That will eliminate the extra partisanship that 
> appointing a Chief Justice will bring. 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use 
> 
> iQA/AwUBQxw/L/34lmKmdrVUEQL4XQCgvBWcCD3blafpwjpd2xAMpXGf7loAn3O3 
> 52BReXDQPyEqR8LWBrkYHG4E 
> =dy37 
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20050905/811d43b9/attachment.html 


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list