Rushtalk seems to be down ( RE Carl's reply to an old message)

John Nebel john.nebel at CSDCO.COM
Sat Dec 6 09:58:04 MST 2008


Thanks for the reply to the two week old message.  That fact, the subject line, 
and the old time stamp on your e-mail caused some puzzlement.



Message received by Athena:

Received: from ( [])
	by (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA293850;
	Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:55:13 -0700 (MST)

Message sent by you, perhaps by carrier pigeon:

Date:         Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:04:48 -0800
Reply-To: Open discussion of current events <RUSHTALK at CSDCO.COM>
Sender: Open discussion of current events <RUSHTALK at CSDCO.COM>
From: Carl Spitzer <cwsiv_2nd at HOTPOP.COM>
Subject: Re: Rushtalk seems to be down

Your SMTP relay received it 21 yours later? The bird maybe stopped for snacks?:

Received: by (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 48fb48fb) id
           sj1-dm102.4935e539.15a0bd for <RUSHTALK at CSDCO.COM>; Sat, 6 Dec 2008
           07:55:05 -0800

Carl Spitzer wrote:
> Yes windows servers ar as buggy as windows in general.
> Thankfully the web backbone is Unix of some kind.  You do not even need
> IIS you can run Apache on NT just fine.
> On Sat, 2008-11-22 at 21:09 -0700, John Nebel wrote:
>> Bernie,
>> Thanks for letting me know.
>> I renewed the listserv license and it turned out Lsoft sent one valid for 
>> Windows, but Rushtalk runs on Unix.  The old one is now back in.
>> Lsoft has been e-mailed about its error.
>> This is the 23rd rewewal or upgrade since I've been dealing with Lsoft and the 
>> P/O sent to them was identical to last year's.  Who would have guessed they 
>> would screw it up?
>> I've been getting less suspicious with age, perhaps that is not wise.
>> You should now be seeing the non-delivered messages now.
>> John
>> f16rsdad at wrote:
>>> Hi John.  I'm just letting you know that the list seems to be down.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bernie

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list