[Rushtalk] *BRILLIANT*

John A. Quayle blueoval57 at verizon.net
Sat Dec 1 13:19:02 MST 2012


At 07:34 AM 11/30/2012, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>Content-type: multipart/alternative;
>  boundary="Boundary_(ID_lFaLtbtuPzEiJdZsgIqzHQ)"
>Content-language: en-us
>
>
>
>From: rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com] 
>On Behalf Of John A. Quayle
>Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 9:02 PM
>To: Rushtalk Discussion List; 'Rushtalk Discussion List'
>Subject: Re: [Rushtalk] *BRILLIANT*
>
>At 07:26 AM 11/29/2012, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
>Content-type: multipart/alternative;
>  boundary="Boundary_(ID_q1y+d9R3KAcbgDEGU6tLzA)"
>Content-language: en-us
>
>
>
>From: <mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com>rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com 
>[ mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com] On Behalf Of John A. Quayle
>Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:40 PM
>To: Rushtalk Discussion List; 'Rushtalk Discussion List'
>Subject: Re: [Rushtalk] *BRILLIANT*
>
>At 10:06 PM 11/28/2012, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
>Content-type: multipart/alternative;
>  boundary="Boundary_(ID_cH+XdhSALCrWxGXIfKoR6w)"
>Content-language: en-us
>
>Interesting that you find  Glenn soaking Obama in urine hilarious, 
>and then you criticize Stern's "bathroom" humor.
>
>          First of all, Stephen, the jar of "urine" isn't real, 
> okay? The liquid is made to look like real urine. Just like the 
> shoot'em up TeeVee shows like "Gun Smoke" weren't real, either.
>
>Well, you neglected to mention that when you first posted it, and 
>you neglected to mention it when you referred to the incident as 
>hilarious.  You didn't mention this until you were called on I and 
>decided to back-pedal, so my comments stand.
>
>          I haven't back-pedalled on ANYTHING, Stephen! This is and 
> has been about freedom of speech and the liberal double standard. 
> They can call placing a crucifix in REAL uri ne and call it art 
> (even getting federal subsidies in the process), but they went 
> apoplectic over Glenn's attempt at humor by doing the same thing - 
> except the urine wasn't real. It was beer!
>
>I don't give a crap what the liberals do, John. "YOU" found soaking 
>it in urine hilarious. Yu made no mention that it was beer or 
>anything else. You wrote "urine". You wrote that it was hilarious. 
>And you wrote that it was OK because, even though it may have been 
>improper, it was not as bad as what liberals had done. It was an 
>abhorrent thing to do, and you found it hilarious based on its moral 
>relativism.  That's disgusting.

         That's your opinion, but not mine...............not even 
close. End of story.......
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20121201/4eecfa94/attachment.html 


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list