[Rushtalk] North Korea

Dennis Putnam dap1 at bellsouth.net
Tue Apr 9 07:12:15 MDT 2013


I guess for the same reason police are allowed to shoot suspects when
threatened BEFORE they are shot themselves.

On 4/8/2013 9:54 PM, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
> This couldn't play any better into their hands and plans if it were
> scripted.
>
>  
>
> Why are we always so anxious to go to war?  Is all out war with North
> Korea what we really want?  Haven't we had enough war for a while? 
> Isn't war something we should strive to avoid?
>
>  
>
> *From:*rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Dennis Putnam
> *Sent:* Monday, April 08, 2013 8:59 AM
> *To:* rushtalk at csdco.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] North Korea
>
>  
>
> However, you look at it, they have made their threats. We now should
> take them at their word. Launch a missile, assume it is targeting the
> South or the US and shoot it down. If military aircraft leave their
> airspace assume they are making good on their rhetoric and shoot it
> down. We should not have to wait until someone dies to defend
> ourselves or the south.
>
> On 4/8/2013 11:37 AM, Tom Matiska wrote:
>
>     *The 1953 cease fire was not a peace treaty and did not formally
>     end the war.  Technically a state of war has existed since 27 May
>     2009 when N. Korea declared itself no longer bound  by the cease
>     fire,    but to restart the war for that reason is not so simple.
>
>     S. Korea never signed the cease fire.  That leaves only China and
>     U.S. as the remaining signatures, but it formally wasn't their
>     war. The U.N. resolution was passed when the PRC was an outsider
>     looking in.  ROC held the U.N. seat then.
>
>     Fashion today is for a govt body to formally declare war.  We seem
>     to forget that an act of war counts. The next Korean  war will
>     (re)start with a bang, not a govt vote.
>
>     Tom    *
>
>
>     --- On *Mon, 4/8/13, Dennis Putnam /<dap1 at bellsouth.net>
>     <mailto:dap1 at bellsouth.net>/* wrote:
>
>
>     From: Dennis Putnam <dap1 at bellsouth.net> <mailto:dap1 at bellsouth.net>
>     Subject: Re: [Rushtalk] North Korea
>     To: rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:rushtalk at csdco.com>
>     Date: Monday, April 8, 2013, 8:43 AM
>
>     They already have. They have voided the treated and publicly
>     stated they are at war. We should simply treat it as though they
>     meant it.
>
>     On 4/7/2013 8:43 PM, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
>         They don't.  They want to think that someone else has started
>         it.  Let's not.
>
>          
>
>         *From:*rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com
>         </mc/compose?to=rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com>
>         [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com
>         </mc/compose?to=rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com>] *On Behalf Of
>         *Richard Whitenight
>         *Sent:* Sunday, April 07, 2013 4:25 PM
>         *To:* Rushtalk Discussion List
>         *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] North Korea
>
>          
>
>         Dennis, it's so difficult for me to believe that they would
>         even want to start a conflict, because they should know that
>         any attempt at war on their part would destroy their country
>         in a short period of time. All you have to do is look at their
>         country at nighttime and realize there's no power to even turn
>         on lights at night.
>
>         On Sunday, April 7, 2013, Dennis Putnam wrote:
>
>         All bluster. All their technology is decades old and in poor
>         condition including small arms. Their missiles cannot carry
>         nuke warheads yet. However, since they say they are in a state
>         of war against the US and the south, I'd shoot down any
>         missile launched anywhere in the country and say it is self
>         defense based on their statements of war. I'd also shoot down
>         any military aircraft that leaves their airspace.
>
>         On 4/7/2013 7:12 PM, Richard Whitenight wrote:
>
>         e="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt;">
>
>         I don't know about y'all, but the situation with North Korea
>         has me worried. What say y'all?
>
>
>
>         -- 
>         Regards,
>         Richard Whitenight
>         Arlington, Texas
>         "Show your support for the Wounded Warrior Project
>         <https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/Default.aspx?tsid=167&campaignSource=CDRO&source=B100108>"
>         Vietnam - Oct 68 to April 69 & Oct 69 to Oct 70
>
>         God bless America and our men and women in uniform.
>
>          
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Rushtalk mailing list
>
>         Rushtalk at csdco.com </mc/compose?to=Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>
>         http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>      
>
>
>     -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Rushtalk mailing list
>     Rushtalk at csdco.com </mc/compose?to=Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>     http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Rushtalk mailing list
>
>     Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>
>     http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rushtalk mailing list
> Rushtalk at csdco.com
> http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20130409/5d338d33/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20130409/5d338d33/attachment-0001.bin 


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list