[Rushtalk] North Korea

Dennis Putnam dap1 at bellsouth.net
Tue Apr 9 19:58:22 MDT 2013


That is what I've been saying and you seemed to have been disagreeing.
The PRK has communicated that it is an eminent threat. We have to take
that seriously and any launched missile has to be presumed to be an attack.

On 4/9/2013 6:58 PM, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
> Police shoot when they truly believe it's a last resort.  Let's behave
> the same way.
>
>  
>
> *From:*rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Dennis Putnam
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 09, 2013 6:12 AM
> *To:* rushtalk at csdco.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] North Korea
>
>  
>
> I guess for the same reason police are allowed to shoot suspects when
> threatened BEFORE they are shot themselves.
>
> On 4/8/2013 9:54 PM, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
>     This couldn't play any better into their hands and plans if it
>     were scripted.
>
>      
>
>     Why are we always so anxious to go to war?  Is all out war with
>     North Korea what we really want?  Haven't we had enough war for a
>     while?  Isn't war something we should strive to avoid?
>
>      
>
>     *From:*rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com
>     <mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com>
>     [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com] *On Behalf Of *Dennis Putnam
>     *Sent:* Monday, April 08, 2013 8:59 AM
>     *To:* rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:rushtalk at csdco.com>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] North Korea
>
>      
>
>     However, you look at it, they have made their threats. We now
>     should take them at their word. Launch a missile, assume it is
>     targeting the South or the US and shoot it down. If military
>     aircraft leave their airspace assume they are making good on their
>     rhetoric and shoot it down. We should not have to wait until
>     someone dies to defend ourselves or the south.
>
>     On 4/8/2013 11:37 AM, Tom Matiska wrote:
>
>         *The 1953 cease fire was not a peace treaty and did not
>         formally end the war.  Technically a state of war has existed
>         since 27 May 2009 when N. Korea declared itself no longer
>         bound  by the cease fire,    but to restart the war for that
>         reason is not so simple.
>
>         S. Korea never signed the cease fire.  That leaves only China
>         and U.S. as the remaining signatures, but it formally wasn't
>         their war. The U.N. resolution was passed when the PRC was an
>         outsider looking in.  ROC held the U.N. seat then.
>
>         Fashion today is for a govt body to formally declare war.  We
>         seem to forget that an act of war counts. The next Korean  war
>         will (re)start with a bang, not a govt vote.
>
>         Tom    *
>
>
>         --- On *Mon, 4/8/13, Dennis Putnam /<dap1 at bellsouth.net>
>         <mailto:dap1 at bellsouth.net>/* wrote:
>
>
>
>         From: Dennis Putnam <dap1 at bellsouth.net>
>         <mailto:dap1 at bellsouth.net>
>         Subject: Re: [Rushtalk] North Korea
>         To: rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:rushtalk at csdco.com>
>         Date: Monday, April 8, 2013, 8:43 AM
>
>         They already have. They have voided the treated and publicly
>         stated they are at war. We should simply treat it as though
>         they meant it.
>
>         On 4/7/2013 8:43 PM, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
>             They don't.  They want to think that someone else has
>             started it.  Let's not.
>
>              
>
>             *From:*rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com
>             </mc/compose?to=rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com>
>             [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com
>             </mc/compose?to=rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com>] *On Behalf Of
>             *Richard Whitenight
>             *Sent:* Sunday, April 07, 2013 4:25 PM
>             *To:* Rushtalk Discussion List
>             *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] North Korea
>
>              
>
>             Dennis, it's so difficult for me to believe that they
>             would even want to start a conflict, because they should
>             know that any attempt at war on their part would destroy
>             their country in a short period of time. All you have to
>             do is look at their country at nighttime and realize
>             there's no power to even turn on lights at night.
>
>             On Sunday, April 7, 2013, Dennis Putnam wrote:
>
>             All bluster. All their technology is decades old and in
>             poor condition including small arms. Their missiles cannot
>             carry nuke warheads yet. However, since they say they are
>             in a state of war against the US and the south, I'd shoot
>             down any missile launched anywhere in the country and say
>             it is self defense based on their statements of war. I'd
>             also shoot down any military aircraft that leaves their
>             airspace.
>
>             On 4/7/2013 7:12 PM, Richard Whitenight wrote:
>
>             e="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt;">
>
>             I don't know about y'all, but the situation with North
>             Korea has me worried. What say y'all?
>
>
>
>             -- 
>             Regards,
>             Richard Whitenight
>             Arlington, Texas
>             "Show your support for the Wounded Warrior Project
>             <https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/Default.aspx?tsid=167&campaignSource=CDRO&source=B100108>"
>             Vietnam - Oct 68 to April 69 & Oct 69 to Oct 70
>
>             God bless America and our men and women in uniform.
>
>              
>
>
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>
>             Rushtalk mailing list
>
>             Rushtalk at csdco.com </mc/compose?to=Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>
>             http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>          
>
>
>         -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Rushtalk mailing list
>         Rushtalk at csdco.com </mc/compose?to=Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>         http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Rushtalk mailing list
>
>         Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>
>         http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>      
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Rushtalk mailing list
>
>     Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>
>     http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rushtalk mailing list
> Rushtalk at csdco.com
> http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20130409/b29241a2/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20130409/b29241a2/attachment-0001.bin 


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list