[Rushtalk] Rubio Must Disqualify Himself from High Office

Carl Spitzer Winblows at lavabit.com
Fri Feb 22 14:51:11 MST 2013


          Rubio Must Disqualify Himself

                      from High Office

                                            JANUARY 21, 2013

                              JB Williams
                               Source …..

constitution-naturalIf so-called “constitutionalists” were better
acquainted with the Constitution (Charters of Freedom), they would not
be supporting Marco Rubio for an office he is not eligible to hold and
they would have already removed Barack Hussein Obama from the office he
currently holds fraudulently.

Marco Rubio is in the unique position to solve our nation’s greatest
problem, to remove a foreign agent currently assaulting America from
within the Oval Office and set the nation back on a constitutional
course towards freedom and liberty. Rubio has an opportunity to be a
true American hero. Will he be?

Because Rubio was dragged into the political spotlight by Tea Party
folks in desperate search of new conservative leadership, and because he
shares in common with Obama, constitutional ineligibility for the
offices of president and vice president under Article II requirements,
he is uniquely positioned to bring down the most anti-American regime to
ever hold political power in the United States.

Unlike “birthers” who are trying to disqualify Obama on the basis of his
unconfirmed place of birth (native born status), which is still in
question due to Obama’s fraudulent efforts to hide his real past and
true identity, using nondisclosure and forged documents to remain a
total mystery, — true “constitutionalists” who have studied the matter
completely and allowed the facts to emerge without partisan purpose,
know the whole truth.

1) The foundations for America are stated in the preamble to the
Declaration of Independence. Pay particular attention to the parts

        IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
        The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of
        “When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for
        one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected
        them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth,
        the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and
        of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions
        of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which
        impel them to the separation.”

Contrary to contemporary teachings by revisionists, the legal precepts
for everything our Founders created is NOT “British common law” which we
separated from via the Declaration and the American Revolution. It is
“The laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” as stated in the preamble to
our nation’s founding document, The Declaration. Just as freedom and
liberty are “natural rights” inalienable by men, so is the right
of Natural Born Citizenship.

2) Revisionists claim that Natural Born Citizen is not defined in the
Constitution. However, the US Constitution does not have a definitions
section; therefore, it provides no definition for any of the words or
terms used in that document. Of course, as the Charters of Freedom were
written in plain simple English so that any citizen could read and
comprehend their rights and the limited functions of the government
bodies they were to form, no definitions were needed. Everyone alive at
the time knew the true meaning of every word and every term, including
Natural Born Citizen. But 236 years later, dumbed down by revisionist
propaganda, Americans may have to do a little homework to rediscover
basic truths.

3) During that period in history, the framing of the Charters of
Freedom, our Founders left a perfect record of their concerns and
intents in the Federalist Papers. Anyone not able to comprehend the
simple English carefully crafted in the Charters of Freedom can study
the thoughts behind those words in the Federalist Papers. If you do not
know the Federalists Papers, you do not know the Constitution.

4) There is no guess-work or ambiguity… We know from reading the
correspondences of our Founders, that they borrowed the concepts for
the Charters of Freedom (Natural Law – Laws of Nature – God’s Law –
inalienable Law of Nations) — from the internationally recognized
authority on the subject at the time, Vattel, recorded in French and
later translated to English,The Law of Nations, written on the
inalienable laws of nature respected by all nations and inescapable by
man. [Most of the Founding Fathers were as fluent in French as they were
English.] Included, was the term Natural Born Citizen, a citizen by the
laws of nature, not the laws of man, in fact, inalienable by the laws of

In Vattel’s Law of Nations, he defines the term Natural Born Citizen,
not in one sentence, but in several sections, 211 – 233 of Book One. One
truly seeking the truth about our Charters of Freedom and Natural Born
Citizenship should read the entire Law of Nations, it is a brilliant
work on Natural Law and it is in fact the cornerstone of the Charters of
Freedom created by our Founders.

But in short, Vattel defines Natural Born Citizen as follow;

NOTE: “Birthers” mistakenly (or intentionally) cherry-pick a single
sentence from several sections on the subject, discarding all else,
including the actual definition. – “The natives, or natural-born
citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” –
This is NOT the definition of Natural Born Citizen. It is only a general
statement affirming that natives are born in country and naturals are
born of citizen parents.

Vattel goes on to define Natural Born Citizen and the reasoning behind

* “As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by
the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the
condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”

** “The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and
these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.”

*** “I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a
person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of
a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his


This is why Barack Hussein Obama is a total fraud, constitutionally
ineligible for office. 

Unfortunately, so is Marco Rubio, among others.


If Marco Rubio is the great “American Son” he portrays himself to be,
the great young constitutionally conservative leader that so many Tea
Party folks hope that he is, he must take a stand for the US
Constitution and America right now, as only he can do.

Because many of his loyal followers have such high hopes for his
political future, Marco Rubio can secure that future by taking the stand
that only he is positioned to take right now.

Unless and until so-called “constitutionalists” get Article II right,
they can forget every right they think they have….because if Article II
does not exist in force or affect, neither does any other part of those
founding documents that protect the Natural Rights of all American

I call upon Marco Rubio to stand and become the great leader he wants to
be, the leader so many believe him to be. I call upon Marco Rubio to
stand and tell ALL Americans that he is ineligible for the offices of
president and vice president, as the natural born son of a Father who
was a citizen of Cuba (not the United States) at the time of his birth.

Man-made statutes generously gave Rubio and many others like him,
American citizenship, via the 14th Amendment, our immigration and
naturalization amendment governing the citizenship rights of immigrants
through naturalization, or native born rights.

Rubio is a citizen of the United States by way of man-made laws, not
Natural Law.

Likewise, no matter whether Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya, his
natural birth Father was at no time in his life a citizen of the United
States. Therefore, Obama’s Father could not confer to Barack Hussein
Obama II that which he did not possess, U.S. Citizenship.

Marco Rubio can solve this entire issue and much more. He can stop
Obama’s Marxist march off the cliff and save the country he claims to
care about deeply, as well as freedom and liberty in America. He can do
so by standing up before the nation and the world, proclaiming himself
ineligible for high office and demanding that Barack Hussein Obama be
immediately removed from office and charged with high treason for the
most horrific fraud ever perpetrated on the American public and the

If Rubio refuses to do so, he is NOT what so many had hoped. He will be
nothing more than just another political fraud seeking personal gain at
the expense of the US Charters of Freedom and the future of freedom and
liberty, not just here, but throughout the free world.

If Article II no longer matters, nothing in the Charters of Freedom
matters anymore.

I call upon Marco Rubio to take a stand and end this nightmare. Stand
and tell the people the truth Mr. Rubio, or become just another
disappointment to the people, pandering to the captive Tea Party
audience but no less complicit in the massive fraud.

DO IT NOW… Before a second fraudulent inauguration!

I have sent this call for action directly to Marco Rubio and I call upon
you to do the same.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20130222/34ac68ee/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list