[Rushtalk] British National Archives show a son was born to Obama Sr. in 1961 in Kenya
Winblows at lavabit.com
Tue Jun 4 15:49:58 MDT 2013
British National Archives show a son
was born to Obama Sr. in 1961 in Kenya
Posted on 4 May, 2013 by Amy
by Dr. Eowyn |
The [British] National Archives (BNA) is an executive agency of the
government of the United Kingdom. Based in Kew in southwest London, the
BNA is the UK government’s official archive, containing 1,000 years of
history from Domesday Book to the present, with records from parchment
and paper scrolls to digital files and archived websites, including
Foreign Office and Colonial Office correspondence and files. The
collections held by the BNA can be searched using their online
catalogue. Entrance to the Archives is free.
On April 18, 2012, the BNA released the first batch of thousands of
“lost” colonial-era files believed to have been destroyed, including
files on Britain’s former colony of Kenya. Reporters at the UK’s The
Guardian were among the first who looked at some of the newly released
colonial files. They found that the name of Barack Obama (henceforth,
Obama Sr.), the father of the POS in the White House, is on the top of a
list of names revealed in a hitherto secret British colonial file of
Kenyans studying in the United States.
But it’s not just UK journalists who can access the British National
Archives; anyone can. In May 2012, someone conducted a search of the
Archives using the search term “Obama” and found that an unnamed son of
Obama Sr. was born in Kenya in 1961. Since the POS in the White House is
the only known son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before 1963 when
Kenya became officially independent from the UK, it is reasonable for us
to conclude that the POS is that unnamed son of Obama Sr. born in Kenya
in 1961. And in fact, the claimed birth date of the POS is August 4,
Barack Hussein Obama Sr. (l); Stanley Ann Dunham (r). For a couple who
supposedly married and had a child together, it is odd to say the least
that there is not a single photo of Obama and Dunham together.
Below are excerpts from Dan Crosby’s on-site report from Kew for The
Daily Pen, “Obama’s Kenya Birth Records Discovered in British National
Archives,” July 18, 2012:
Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded
Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to
Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were
well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing
investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have
found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the
public records section of the British National Archives indicating the
occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of
Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa
(Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before
Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already
discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary
agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya. Prior to Obama’s
ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated
that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative
assembly. Since then information on Obama’s ties has been curtailed by
government officials as the Obama administration has coincidentally paid
nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya.
Also, the presence of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted
for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama,
until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961 when she
allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington.
Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in
the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to
Nairobi as one of many recent high school graduates (see AASF Report
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is
significant because biographical information about Obama’s family
indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s
The books containing hand written line records of vital events
attributed to Obama [Sr.] are contained in Series RG36 of the Family
Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line
records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were
registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and
spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births
recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a
birth in 1961. Barack Obama [Sr.] is said to have died in 1982 and had
married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in
1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to
the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved
independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born
after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth
information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that
only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were
recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National
Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to
20 years after creation in 2010).
The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children,
only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers
of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration
applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obama
[Sr.]’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books.
Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the
relevant microfilm for the Obama [Sr.] birth registrations, they were
told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged
access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52,
Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.
However, evidence shows these records were available for public access
before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary
Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.
Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a
sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British
agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial
protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in
early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at
Clinton’s arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping
in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.
For someone who wanted to remain in America, it’s difficult to imagine
any reason why Barack Obama’s alleged father, Barack the elder, would
omit the birth of an “anchor baby” son on an application to extend his
visa, just days after the birth occurred, unless…
The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his
father was a former goat herder from Kenya. However, INS documents filed
in the very same month after Obama’s birth suggest the goat herding
elder Obama didn’t “get the memo” that he was a daddy.
On August 31st, 1961, just weeks after Obama’s birth was allegedly
registered in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama
the elder neglected to name his newborn son on an application for
extension of his temporary visa to stay in the U.S.
Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the
fact that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s
application for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to
extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S.,
especially when the other parent is an American citizen.
Despite the recent release of a documentary film “Dreams From My Real
Father” presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not the
biological father of the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named
as the father on the digital image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate
of Live Birth” which was posted to the internet by the administration in
April of 2011. The document image has since been forensically examined
by law enforcement investigators and determined to be a digitally
fabricated forgery using Adobe software.
[...], in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation
of the State of Hawaii’s birth statistics collection protocols and vital
records history that birth certificates are often amended after the
birth while the original paper document is sealed under strict
confidentiality rules when the identity of the father is either
determined after birth or when the father named on the new version of
the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal responsibility for the
In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the
biological father’s name because the mother does not provide it, or it
may list paternity as “unknown”, but this version is kept confidential
under HRS 571. [...] Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual
time of the birth is not disclosed while the new amended certificate is
upheld as the original version displaying the name of the newly
identified or adoptive father as indistinguishable if different from the
biological father. This law is meant to protect the child from stigmas
resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or adultery. Under these
circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal status of a child
at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible by
authorized persons under Hawaiian law.
[...] If Obama [Sr.] is not the biological father, or if paternal
information is listed on the original certificate as “unknown”, the
state of Hawaii keeps this information secret until a court orders the
documents to be released for discovery purposes in determining Obama’s
eligibility. Thus far, courts have lacked courage to uphold the
Constitution thereby propagating the greatest political fraud in
American history. Judges are simply washing their hands of the issue by
refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying
citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of
grievances, because they simply do not have the courage to face the
legal crisis such a revelation would cause.
[...] Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married
to a woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to
Dunham in order to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S.
There is no evidence or testimony that Obama [Sr.] ever loved Dunham or
that the two had ever been engaged. The two did not live together before
or after being married and there were no letters, no ring, no
announcement or, most importantly, no legal marriage registration with
the State of Hawaii.
Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears
Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964. However,
images posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original
documented proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was
the father of Dunham’s child. A review of the court documents shows that
at least one document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby
Obama, was missing from the numbering sequence.
Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward
allowing a foreign spouse to remain the U.S. However, no marriage
license application or public announcement has ever been found to
indicate that Obama and Dunham were ever married or that Obama [Sr.] had
even divorced his Kenyan wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham.
This fact supports the contents of memos from college and INS officials
who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of Obama’s relationship with
Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union between a teenage
woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days after the
birth of her child.
[...] Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil
Abercrombie, Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections
official, Tim Adams have all indicated that they could find no original
record of Obama’s alleged birth in any hospital in Hawaii in the course
of their duties to verify his eligibility. The absence of verifiable
birth documentation was so apparent that Schatz, serving as the chairman
of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused to certify that Obama
was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of presidentwhen
he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama. Schatz
deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of
the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin. Cronin resigned
suddenly after controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his
relationship with the commission.
[...] Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of
the Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of
those questioning Obama’s eligibility in a delusion that he must be
legitimate because his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers.
[...] Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the
mother’s claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of
the birth, which was in compliance with guidelines established by the
National Center for Health Statistics in order to accurately attribute
data from births with decadal Census figures. [...] The impact of
population figures on the Hawaii’s economy and agency resources was very
significant in 1961. The accuracy of the Census takes precedence over
the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S. [...]
According to Dan Crosby, the specific sources of information pertaining
to births of Kenyan nationals under British jurisdiction can be
researched in the following BNA files (Courtesy: British National
General Register Office
Registers and Returns of Births, Marriages and Deaths in the
Protectorates etc of Africa and Asia
Legal status: Public Record(s)
Creator names: General Register Office, 1836-1970
Covering Birth Registration dates: 1895-1965
Physical description: 15 volume(s)
Access conditions: Available in microform only
Held by: The National Archives, Kew
Scope and content: Notifications forwarded by officials responsible for
civil registration under administrative ordinances in Nyasaland, Kenya,
Somaliland, Uganda, Sudan, Palestine, Sarawak, Malaya, including Johore
and Selangor, and British North Borneo, commencing at varying dates.
Publication note: Geoffrey Yeo ‘The British Overseas, A Guide to Records
of Their Births, Baptisms, Marriages, Deaths and Burials Available in
the United Kingdom’, London, 2nd edn, 1988.
Related material: Some earlier returns from the East African territories
in the period during which they were under Foreign Office control are in
the consular registers retained in the custody of the registrar general.
Place: Kenya, Africa (Territory Thereof): 1920 – 1963
Subjects: Birth: registration
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rushtalk