[Rushtalk] Don't impeach Obama!!
John A. Quayle
blueoval57 at verizon.net
Wed Mar 27 14:27:52 MDT 2013
It'd certainly be nice if Ms. Kidd knew the law before
bloviating. Unfortunately, she couldn't be more wrong. I've already
told her this and she ignores me. Here's what a retired
Constitutional Attorney wrote:
It is not true.
Here are The Ways to get rid of sitting presidents:
1. Impeach them (Art. II, Sec. 4)
2. Remove them for mental reasons (25th Amendment, Sec. 4)
3. Get him to resign.
4. Defeat them when they run again.
5. A natural death
Americans do love their silly sensational gimmicks, don't they? Can
the mere TRUTH compete with a silly gimmick?
It is impossible to criminally prosecute a sitting president b/c the
prosecutors all work for him. The President can fire the Atty
General and the U.S. Attorneys with the stroke of a pen.
So Presidents can be criminally prosecuted only AFTER they are
removed from office. See, e.g., Federalist Paper No. 69 (4th para).
Can you imagine being criminally prosecuted for a crime and having
the power to fire the prosecutor and everyone on his staff?
About undoing all - ALL - of zero's acts: Congress made the laws
which zero signed. The Senate approved zero's judicial nominations.
Congress goes along with zero's dismantling of the military. Congress
goes along with the buildup of the SWAT teams in the federal
executive agencies. zero's lawless executive orders could be ignored
in some cases; in other cases, Congress could negate them by
dismantling and defunding anything zero set up in the executive orders.
Zero isn't the problem: The American people are - those who elect the
U.S. Senators and Representatives who go along with what zero does.
This silly notion that zero is not "really" president b/c he is not
eligible, is like saying that the 16th Amendment is not binding b/c
it wasn't properly ratified. Well, try making that argument in court
if you are prosecuted for not paying taxes. IT DOESN'T MATTER WHETHER
THE 16TH AMENDMENT WAS PROPERLY RATIFIED OR NOT, b/c the federal
government prosecutes people all the time for not obeying their tax
laws, the juries - yes, juries - convict the defendants, and the
judges smile all the way thru the trials. The judges will NOT PERMIT
defense counsel to make the argument to the Jury that the 16th
Amendment was not properly ratified.
WE need to deal with reality instead of silly theories.
Feel free to copy and re-post this.
At 03:16 AM 3/27/2013, Paf Dvorak wrote:
><http://thatswaytoomuch.info/>notmyname at thatswaytoomuch.info
>Rushtalk mailing list
>Rushtalk at csdco.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rushtalk