[Rushtalk] *OUTRAGEOUS*!!

John A. Quayle blueoval57 at verizon.net
Thu Nov 7 15:09:38 MST 2013

At 03:53 PM 11/7/2013, Paf Dvorak wrote:
>At 01:12 PM 11/7/2013 -0500, John A. Quayle wrote:
>>At 10:29 AM 11/7/2013, Paf Dvorak wrote:
>>>At 05:56 PM 11/6/2013 -0500, John A. Quayle wrote:
>>>>At 04:50 PM 11/6/2013, Steven Laib wrote:
>>>>>Interestingly, the original warrant 
>>>>>(apparently based on no evidence other than 
>>>>>the officer's say so) was issued in one 
>>>>>county and then enforced in another when the 
>>>>>firs doctor refused to cooperate based on ethical concerns.
>>>>>This is a case that should have significant 
>>>>>repercussions if the court handles it 
>>>>>properly. I'd have to two officers working 
>>>>>for the rest of their lives to compensate 
>>>>>the guy.  There was no grounds for 
>>>>>proceeding further when the x-ray was negative.
>>>>         EXACTLY, Steve! And his age 
>>>> should've been a factor, too. How many 54 
>>>> year-old drug "mules" do you see these days? 
>>>> These LEO's should NEVER be able to put on a badge again! - jaq
>>>So it wasn't a total loss, I hope they checked 
>>>for polyps while they were up there.
>>         They handed him a $6k bill, too, for 
>> "services rendered" - procedures he NEVER 
>> agreed to (which is HIGHLY illegal! You cannot 
>> perform any medical process on anyone without their expressed consent
>Not true. Here in The White Trash Mountains® of 
>Tennessee the pigs can take your blood by force 
>if you refuse to blow into their Field Insobriety Tubes.

         True, but this man had been pulled over 
for a minor traffic violation. BIG difference!

- jaq 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20131107/426b209b/attachment.html 

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list