[Rushtalk] demolish all mosques

Dennis Putnam dap1 at bellsouth.net
Thu Nov 28 20:58:15 MST 2013


Don't go off on a tangent on me. We hare talking about those that have
proven their willingness to kill along with their enablers.

On 11/28/2013 10:06 PM, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
> Agreed.  Nor does "turn the other cheek" mean we can kill those we
> believe **may** do us harm.  So whom do we kill under the doctrine of
> "self-defense"?  Anyone and everyone that's the same color, or the
> same religion, or whatever as those who have killed before?  Those
> innocents who have died as result of "collateral damage" in our war on
> terror may harbor the same sentiment.  May they start killing us in
> self-defense?  Where would this ever stop?  I wonder?
>
>  
>
> *From:*rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Dennis Putnam
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 28, 2013 5:11 PM
> *To:* rushtalk at csdco.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] demolish all mosques
>
>  
>
> I don't know about waving the flag of Christianity but I'm sure "turn
> the other cheek' was not intended to mean allow yourself to be killed.
> Self defense is a logical extension of the right to life.
>
> On 11/28/2013 11:07 AM, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
>     I don't deny that, Dennis.  So maybe we should just kill them all
>     while proudly waving the banner of our Christianity.  I am sure
>     that's what Our Loving Savior has always intended.  He died for
>     our freedom to do that.
>
>      
>
>     *From:*rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com
>     <mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com>
>     [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com] *On Behalf Of *Dennis Putnam
>     *Sent:* Thursday, November 28, 2013 6:20 AM
>     *To:* rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:rushtalk at csdco.com>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] demolish all mosques
>
>      
>
>     On 11/27/2013 7:34 PM, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
>         The inquisition come to mind.
>
>          
>
>         The cutting off of native American's earlobes for not
>         converting to Christianity comes to mind.  The denying medical
>         treatment to those who wouldn't convert to Christianity comes
>         to mind.
>
>     Hardly valid comparisons (note: I'd rather have my earlobe cut off
>     then beheaded or fed feet first into a chipper or thrown off a 2nd
>     story building multiple times until I died). And when those
>     incidents happened, were there world wide celebrations in the
>     streets by Christians? That is the difference. I would bet that
>     condemnations of those incidents exceeded or at least equaled
>     celebrations. Unlike the opposite from world wide Muslims.
>
>
>      
>
>     Just to name a few.
>
>
>         Religious fanatics aren't limited to any single denomination.
>
>     I never said they were. What I tried to say, and obviously failed,
>     is that Muslims are the only set of fanatics that declared open
>     war on non-Muslims and whose vast non-fantaical majority celebrate
>     in the streets when non-Muslims are senselessly slaughtered. And
>     no where, it seems, is there any open condemnation.
>
>
>      
>
>     *From:*rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com
>     <mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com>
>     [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com] *On Behalf Of *Dennis Putnam
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:12 PM
>     *To:* rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:rushtalk at csdco.com>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] demolish all mosques
>
>      
>
>     I understand your basic point but I think you missed Steven's. I
>     know of no incident of Christians, unprovoked, murdering 3000
>     innocent people because they didn't like their religion or way of
>     life. Perhaps if you do you can tell me about it and bring me
>     closer into line with your thinking.
>
>     On 11/26/2013 7:50 PM, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>
>         Freedom of religion -- as long as it's ours.
>
>          
>
>         We're no better than those we eschew.  Not one damned bit.
>
>          
>
>         *From:*rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com
>         <mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com>

>         [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com] *On Behalf Of *John A. Quayle
>         *Sent:* Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:47 PM
>         *To:* Rushtalk Discussion List
>         *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] demolish all mosques
>
>          
>
>         At 04:50 PM 11/26/2013, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         *From:*Paf Dvorak <notmyname at thatswaytoomuch.info
>         <mailto:notmyname at thatswaytoomuch.info>>
>         *To:* Rushtalk Discussion List <rushtalk at csdco.com
>         <mailto:rushtalk at csdco.com>>
>         *Sent:* Tuesday, November 26, 2013 1:36 PM
>         *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] demolish all mosques
>
>         At 05:06 AM 11/26/2013 -0800, Steven Laib wrote:
>
>
>
>
>         If true, they are way ahead of us. 
>
>         SDL
>
>
>         Did you miss the part where they're outlawing *other* religions?
>
>         Apparently, I did.  That part I don't hold with.  Islam is a
>         violent political cult, not a religion in my opinion. 
>         Others don't have that label in my book.
>
>
>                  */_AGREED_/**/!!!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         /*
>
>         SDL
>
>
>
>
>
>         *From:*Paf Dvorak <notmyname at thatswaytoomuch.info
>         <mailto:notmyname at thatswaytoomuch.info>>
>         *To:* rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:rushtalk at csdco.com>
>         *Sent:* Monday, November 25, 2013 10:35 PM
>         *Subject:* [Rushtalk] demolish all mosques
>
>
>         Angola bans Islam, will demolish all mosques   
>
>
>
>
>
>
>           Angola bans Islam, will demolish all mosques
>
>
>
>
>
>         9:02 AM 11/25/2013
>          
>
>         <http://dailycaller.com/2013/11/25/angola-bans-islam-will-demolish-all-mosques/>A
>         number of newspapers in the region are reporting that the
>         Republic of Angola has outlawed Islam, apparently in an effort
>         to thwart the spread of Muslim radicalism in the country.
>
>         Among them was La Nouvelle Tribune, a French-language
>         newspaper out of Morocco, reports the International Business
>         Times
>         <http://www.ibtimes.com/angola-bans-islam-dismantles-mosques-according-news-reports-1483660>.
>
>         La Nouvelle Tribune observed that a minaret on an Angolan
>         mosque had been removed previously. Also, in the small city of
>         Zango, not far from the capital of Luanda, government
>         officials reportedly destroyed a mosque.
>
>         The Moroccan paper quoted AngolaâEUR^(TM)s minister of
>         culture, Rosa Cruz e Silva, for details.
>
>         âEURoeThe process of legalization of Islam has not been
>         approved by the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights,âEUR?
>         Cruz e Silva said. âEURoeTheir mosques would be closed until
>         further notice.âEUR?
>
>         The ban, which includes an order to destroy all mosques in the
>         country, isnâEUR^(TM)t specific to Islam, according to India
>         Today
>         <http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/angola-first-country-to-ban-islam-muslims-mosques-demolished/1/326414.html>.
>         Other faiths which donâEUR^(TM)t meet government approval will
>         face the same restrictions.
>
>         âEURoeAll sects on the list published by the Ministry of
>         Justice and Human Rights in the Angolan newspaper âEUR~Jornal
>         de AngolaâEUR^(TM) are prohibited to conduct worship, so they
>         should keep their doors closed,âEUR? Cruz e Silva was quoted
>         by as saying by the Cameroon Voice.
>
>         ItâEUR^(TM)s not clear which other religions are included.
>
>         Other government officials firmly agreed with the culture
>         minister.
>
>         Bento Francisco Bento, governor of the countryâEUR^(TM)s
>         Luanda province, has declared that radical Muslims are
>         âEURoenot welcome in Angola.âEUR?
>
>         âEURoeThis is the final end of Islamic influence in our
>         country,âEUR? added AngolaâEUR^(TM)s President José Eduardo
>         dos Santos.
>
>         According to the CIAâEUR^(TM)s World Factbook
>         <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ao.html>,
>         the people of Angola are mostly a mix of local tribes.
>         ThereâEUR^(TM)s a very small minority of Europeans.
>         ThereâEUR^(TM)s also a healthy 22 percent representation from
>         ethnic groups called âEURoeother.âEUR?
>
>         About 50 percent of the people in Angola practice indigenous
>         religious beliefs. Roman Catholics make up 38 percent of the
>         population. Protestants make up 15 percent.
>
>         To whatever extent adherents of Islam are living among the 18
>         million or so inhabitants in Angola, then, the population is
>         by all accounts very small.
>
>         Portuguese is the official language of Angola. The country is
>         slightly less than twice the size of Texas.
>
>         /Follow Eric on Twitter <https://twitter.com/ericowensdc> and
>         on Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/EricOwensDC?fref=ts>,
>         and send education-related story tips to erico at dailycaller.com
>         <mailto:erico at dailycaller.com>/.
>
>         Read more:
>         http://dailycaller.com/2013/11/25/angola-bans-islam-will-demolish-all-mosques/#ixzz2litMvktg
>
>
>
>
>         Paf Dvorak
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Rushtalk mailing list
>         Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>         http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Rushtalk mailing list
>         Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>         http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>
>
>
>         Paf Dvorak
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Rushtalk mailing list
>         Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>         http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Rushtalk mailing list
>         Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>         http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Rushtalk mailing list
>
>         Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>
>         http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>      
>
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Rushtalk mailing list
>
>     Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>
>     http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>      
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Rushtalk mailing list
>
>     Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>
>     http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rushtalk mailing list
> Rushtalk at csdco.com
> http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20131128/3e288f51/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20131128/3e288f51/attachment-0001.bin 


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list