[Rushtalk] if you hate wikileaks

Paf Dvorak notmyname at thatswaytoomuch.info
Sun May 4 10:39:15 MDT 2014

At 08:32 AM 5/4/2014 -0700, Tom Matiska wrote:
>OK....prisoner abuse by Iraq is bad, but in what 
>sick twisted way is reading this good???

Ignorance is NOT bliss.

>Jonesing  for more terrorist bomb attacks??

They hate us for our superior morality not 
because our government drop bombs on their children.

>Who made  WikiSpys god and give them the right to fuel more conflict?

Exposing evil to the light of truth is what wikileaks does.

>  Tom

20. (C) COMMENT CONT'D: MOI guards and interrogators at Site
4 appear to have engaged in illegal and violent acts openly
and with impunity.  The frank admissions of MOI personnel
that individual detainees merit physical abuse and the
lackadaisical efforts to conceal that abuse support the
contention -- raised by multiple Iraqi interlocutors -- that
today's INP are not only incapable of conducting detention
operations to acceptable standards, but are unwilling to do

>From: Doc <doc at halebobb.com>
>To: rushtalk at csdco.com
>Sent: Saturday, May 3, 2014 11:29 PM
>Subject: [Rushtalk] if you hate wikileaks
>you'd better not read this
>DE RUEHGB #1960/01 1610421
>P 100421Z JUN 06
>C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BAGHDAD 001960
>E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/08/2016
>TAGS: <http://wikileaks.org/tag/PGOV_0.html>PGOV
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#parB>B. BAGHDAD 1019
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#parC>C. BAGHDAD 4921 05
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#parD>D. BAGHDAD 5020 05
>Classified By: Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad for reasons 1.4 (a) and (d).
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#par1>1. (C) SUMMARY: On May, a joint U.S.-Iraqi inspection of the
>"Site 4" Iraqi National Police (INP) detention complex
>discovered more than 1,400 detainees in squalid, cramped
>conditions.  Forty-one detainees interviewed had bruising and
>lash-marks consistent with violent physical abuse.
>Thirty-seven juveniles were illegally held at the facility,
>many alleging sexual abuse.  Ministry of Interior (MOI)
>officials appear to have been comfortable engaging in
>large-scale violence against detainees at a well-known
>Baghdad facility that had been officially inspected twice
>since December 2005 (and visited unofficially half-a-dozen
>times by Post), indicating that MOI's capture-and-confess
>culture is Unabashedly tolerant of physical abuse.  According
>to latest information from the Civilian Police Assistance
>Training Team (CPATT), several other MOI officers have been
>"detained but not arrested" -- a not-uncommon practice at
>MOI. Ambassador briefed PM Maliki on the size and seriousness
>of the Site 4 abuse on June 5.  Malik was, in his words,
>"appalled" at what happened there.  END SUMMARY.
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#par2>2. (SBU) On May 30, a third joint U.S.-Iraqi inspection of
>the "Site 4" INP detention complex, located in central
>Baghdad, discovered more than 1,400 detainees in two separate
>facilities held in squalid, cramped conditions not uncommon
>in MOI Commando detention facilities.  Forty-one detainees
>interviewed had bruising and lash-marks consistent with
>violent physical abuse.  Thirty-seven juveniles were
>illegally held at the facility, many alleging sexual abuse.
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#par3>3. (SBU) On June 1, the juvenile detainees were removed from
>Site 4 and transported temporarily to an MOI INP facility at
>Muthanna Airfield.  Post is seeking an order from the Higher
>Juridical Council (HJC) authorizing their transfer to the
>Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs (MOLSA) juvenile
>detention facility at Tobchi.  Forty-five adult detainees
>showing marks of abuse were medically-screened, treated, and
>transferred to the "Site 1" INP facility.  An additional
>ninety were transported to an INP facility at FOB Justice.
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#par4>4. (SBU) On June 5, Post and MNF-I returned to Site 4 (which
>is now visited daily by MNF-I's Special Police Training Team
>(SpiTT)) in support of three Iraqi judges tasked by the HJC
>with taking possession of all detainee files on site.  (These
>files will be stored in HJC offices while HJC staff match
>files to a Site 4 roster passed to the HJC by Post and
>MNF-I).  MOI personnel initially resisted surrendering the
>files to the HJC, but after several hours' argument they
>complied upon presentation of a written judicial order.
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#par5>5. (SBU) Follow-up inspections and interviews by MNF-I have
>recorded allegations of physical abuse from 315 detainees,
>many of whom identify the same group of five to six MOI
>officials as the perpetrators of abuse at the Site 4
>facility.  A number of detainees have offered to testify in
>court against their abusers; Post and MNF-I are in contact
>with judicial officials on this matter.  MOI is rumored to
>have "detained but not arrested" the Site 4 Commander and a
>handful of unnamed other personnel.
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#par6>6. (SBU) As noted in reftels, severe overcrowding is
>characteristic of many MOI INP detention facilities.
>However, the situation at Site 4 has been exacerbated by the
>recent MOI decision to transfer hundreds of detainees from
>other Baghdad INP facilities (including Forward Operating
>Base (FOB) Justice) to two adjoining facilities inside the
>Site 4 complex, near MOI Headquarters.
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#par7>7. (SBU) As a result, both Site 4 facilities (one
>BAGHDAD 00001960  002 OF 003
>newly-renovated) are well over acceptable capacity. Detainees
>in Most cells have insufficient space to lie down and must
>sit entwined, knee-to-knee.  Air circulation is poor, and the
>cellblocks are fetid.  The few toilets available are
>overflowing, and sewage spills onto the floors.  Many
>detainees, who are allowed little or no access to fresh air,
>suffer from lice, scabies, and infections.  Food supply is
>adequate, but running water is limited to 1-2 hours per
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#par8>8. (SBU) Of the forty-one detainees interviewed on May 30 who
>displayed bruising, broken bones, and lash-marks, many
>claimed to have been hung by handcuffs from a hook in the
>ceiling and beaten on the soles of their feet and their
>buttocks.  A hook was discovered on the ceiling of an empty
>room at the facility; attached was a chain-and-pulley system
>ordinarily used for lifting vehicles.  Apparent blood spots
>stained the floor underneath. (NOTE: The pulley was
>confiscated and is now at Post.  END NOTE.)
><http://wikileaks.org/cable/2006/06/06BAGHDAD1960.html#par9>9. (SBU) A number of juvenile detainees, mostly young
>teenagers, alleged sexual abuse at the hands of MOI personnel
>-- specifically, that MOI interrogators had used threats and
>acts of anal rape to induce confessions and had forced
>juveniles to fellate them during interrogations.  These
>allegations were also raised independently with inspectors by
>adult detainees who claimed knowledge of juvenile rapes.
>¶10. (C) MOI personnel at Site 4 made some desultory attempts
>to prevent Post and MNF-I from interviewing abused detainees.
>  Site 4 guards initially refused access to the May 30
>inspection team, citing MOI orders, and on June 1 guards were
>caught attempting to hide four abused detainees in a guard
>tower during a follow-on SPiTT inspection.  MOI facility
>management threatened detainees during both inspections,
>warning them not to "talk to the Americans."
>¶11. (C) MOI officials appear to have been comfortable
>engaging in large-scale violence against detainees at a
>well-known Baghdad facility that had been officially
>inspected twice since December 2005 (and visited unofficially
>six times by Post), indicating that MOI's capture-and-confess
>culture is unabashedly tolerant of physical abuse.  In the
>words of MOI official Colonel Adnan (1st INP Division) at
>Site 4 on June 1, ostensibly investigating abuse, "detainees
>guilty of some crimes deserve to be beaten."
>¶12. (C) Colonel Ali (Site 4 Commander) and General Adnan
>Thabit (INP Commander) informed Post and MNF-I some days ago
>that the "sole" three individuals responsible for abusing
>detainees at Site 4 had been detained at the MOI Site 1
>detention facility.  Eleven MOI personnel, including the
>doctor posted to Site 4, were identified by detainees on June
>1 as perpetrators; additional names were provided to MNF-I on
>June 5.
>¶13. (C) COMMENT: It would be difficult, if not impossible,
>for senior MOI INP leadership responsible for Site 4 to be
>unaware of the prevalence of detainee abuse at the facility.
>This is suggested by the large number of detainees with
>serious physical injuries present at Site 4, the obvious and
>illegal presence of 37 juveniles, and the fact that hooks and
>pulleys used to hang detainees from the ceiling were kept in
>plain sight.  END COMMENT.
>¶14. (C) According to latest information from CPATT, Colonel
>Ali and several other MOI officers (primarily from the
>Special Intelligence Directorate) have been "detained but not
>arrested" -- a not-uncommon practice at MOI.  Detainees
>currently held at Site 1 are being interviewed by MNF-I.
>Many of the formerly-abused detainees now at Site 1 have
>BAGHDAD 00001960  003 OF 003
>offered to testify in court against their abusers.
>¶15. (C) In the immediate future, Post and MNF-I will press
>the HJC to order the transfer of all underage detainees to
>the MOLSA facility at Tobchi.  We will also show regular
>presence at Site 4 and at facilities to which Site 4
>detainees have been evacuated in order to check on medical
>needs, availability of food and water, and quality of care
>offered.  The HJC has pledged to review files seized from
>Site 4 to determine which detainees are held subject to a
>valid judicial order.
>¶16. (C) Ambassador briefed PM Maliki on June 5 regarding the
>size and seriousness of the abuse at Site 4.  Maliki was, in
>his words, "appalled" at what happened there.  He has
>appointed a committee headed by the Ministers of Justice and
>Civil Society to deal with the situation.  They will have
>access to inspect detention facilities, and victims of
>torture and children will be released.
>¶17. (C) We will provide full briefings to the Minister of
>Justice, the Chief Justice of the HJC, and the Minister of
>Civil Society and then follow up with them on GOI actions.
>Post is requesting that the GOI and Iraqi courts:
>(i) impose immediate administrative sanctions against MOI
>officials responsible for the facility, pending a judicial
>investigation and criminal charges;
>(ii) order the release of all detainees found at Site 4 who
>are not detained on the basis of a valid judicial order; and
>(iii) undertake a robust criminal investigation of abuse
>allegations related to MOI personnel at the Site 4 facility.
>¶18. (C) Post also will engage the Minister of Justice to plan
>for the transfer of Site 4 detainees who merit further
>detention to MOJ custody.  This transfer will require MOJ to
>take control of and staff the newly-renovated MOI detention
>facility at Baladiyat, which has a capacity of 750.  (NOTE:
>MNF-I will, if required, set up additional temporary tent
>housing within the Baladiyat complex.  END NOTE.)
>¶19. (C) COMMENT: While the overcrowding, lack of sanitation,
>disease, and under-supply of food and water at Site 4 are
>typical of many MOI detention facilities (and were observed
>at Site 4 in December 2005 and February 2006), the physical
>abuse documented by inspectors May 30-June 5 is the most
>severe and widespread since the November 2005 discovery of
>seriously-injured detainees at the MOI Jadiriyah "Bunker"
>¶20. (C) COMMENT CONT'D: MOI guards and interrogators at Site
>4 appear to have engaged in illegal and violent acts openly
>and with impunity.  The frank admissions of MOI personnel
>that individual detainees merit physical abuse and the
>lackadaisical efforts to conceal that abuse support the
>contention -- raised by multiple Iraqi interlocutors -- that
>today's INP are not only incapable of conducting detention
>operations to acceptable standards, but are unwilling to do
>this space intentionally left blank
>Rushtalk mailing list
><mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>Rushtalk at csdco.com
>Rushtalk mailing list
>Rushtalk at csdco.com

Paf Dvorak  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20140504/efb8d2c3/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list