[Rushtalk] Political Payback: Rick Perry Indicted in Power Struggle with Democrat-Controlled DA Office
Carl William Spitzer IV
cwsiv at copper.net
Mon Sep 29 18:55:45 MDT 2014
Political Payback: Rick Perry Indicted in Power Struggle with
Democrat-Controlled DA Office
by Sarah Rumpf 15 Aug 2014 859 post a comment
AUSTIN, Texas — A grand jury indicted Governor Rick Perry Friday for his
attempts to remove Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg
from office after she was arrested for driving while intoxicated last
year in a case that made national headlines.
In April 2013, Lehmberg was arrested after a witness called 911,
describing her as driving erratically, swerving back and forth into the
bike lane, and into oncoming traffic. Officers at the scene reportedly
found an open bottle of vodka in her car, and a blood sample obtained
later that evening purportedly showed a blood alcohol level of 0.239—
almost three times the legal limit—even that many hours later.
Not only did her arrest attracted headlines, but her belligerent
behavior after she was brought to the police station—all captured on
video tape—drew attention, as well. Lehmberg is seen blaming the police
for destroying her political career, yelling and insulting them;
demanding that they call Travis County Sheriff Greg Hamilton; sticking
out her tongue; making faces; kicking at the door to her cell; and
eventually getting restrained with leg irons, being strapped to a chair
and wearing what is commonly referred to as a “spit mask,” which is
usually used when a detainee is spitting or biting. To be fair, the
video does not expressly show that happening, and Lehmberg’s defense
attorney later claimed that the mask was used to “protect her
U_TUBE @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7y7oJ266qI
Lehmberg’s sentence, a fine and 45 days in jail, was most likely the
highest in history in Travis County for a first-time DWI charge. The
investigation into her case also revealed a less-than-flattering picture
of her drinking habits. Subpoenaed receipts from Twin Liquors showed her
buying 72 bottles of Cirroc vodka—totaling more than 23 gallons—in a
15-month period, and that Lehmberg spread her purchases out among
different stores. This amount only covers purchases made with her credit
card at that one liquor store chain, not cash purchases or alcohol
In Texas, the district attorney is the county’s lead law enforcement
officer, and the Travis County District Attorney has the additional
responsibility of prosecuting public crimes under the Public Integrity
Unit, leading to a loud outcry for Lehmberg’s resignation from lawmakers
and public safety groups. State Rep. Phil King (R-Weatherford) sharply
condemned her behavior, saying that what he’d seen on the videos from
her arrest “showed incredible belligerence and disrespect” and an “utter
contempt and disrespect for the law and for the office."
The Texas Local Government Code, in Chapter 87, allows public officials
like district attorneys to be removed from office for "incompetency,
official misconduct, habitual drunkenness, or other causes defined by
law." The 1987 revision to the law added a single incidence of
intoxication on or off duty as a potential cause for removal.
However, because Lehmberg is a Democrat, elected in Travis County, one
of the most Democratic-heavy areas of the state, and Governor Perry, a
Republican, would be able to pick her replacement, other Democrats
quickly rallied to her defense. Other prosecutors who worked under
Lehmberg publicly supported her remaining in office, as did State
Senator Kirk Watson (D-Austin).
Frustrated with Lehmberg’s refusal to resign and maintaining his
position that someone who had committed her offenses was not fit for
office, either as the district attorney or as head of the Public
Integrity Unit, Perry then announced plans to veto funding for the
Public Integrity Unit unless Lehmberg resigned. Texas law clearly grants
the governor the power to veto funding for the Public Integrity Unit and
many other agencies, but Democrats supporting Lehmberg howled in
The Travis County District Attorney’s office has a long history of
politically-motivated prosecutions, including the 2005 indictment of
former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay for alleged campaign finance
violations. DeLay’s convictions were completely overturned and he was
acquitted after an appeal to the Third District Texas Court of Appeals
in 2013—too late to save his political career.
Here, a liberal watchdog group called Texans for Public Justice filed an
ethics complaint against Perry earlier this year, and a grand jury was
convened in the case. Perry spokeswoman Lucy Nashed said at the time,
"The veto in question was made in accordance with the veto power
afforded to every governor under the Texas Constitution, and we remain
ready and willing to assist with this inquiry."
The grand jury’s indictment today, under the supervision of appointed
special prosecutor, Michael McCrum, starts the process for a criminal
case against the Governor but by no means guarantees that an actual
criminal conviction will result. The grand jury process is entirely
one-sided, controlled by the prosecutors, who present only their side.
There’s a famous quote from Tom Wolfe’s book Bonfire of the Vanities,
noting that prosecutors have so much power over this process that they
could “indict a ham sandwich” if they so chose.
Perry’s office released a statement, through his general counsel Mary
Anne Wiley, stating that the governor's actions were allowed under the
law and that they would vigorously fight these charges.
“The veto in question was made in accordance with the veto authority
afforded to every governor under the Texas Constitution," said Wiley.
"We will continue to aggressively defend the governor's lawful and
constitutional action, and believe we will ultimately prevail.”
In the meantime, Lehmberg is facing a new set of legal troubles, as an
ethics complaint was filed against her last week, accusing her of
failing to properly report on her campaign finance reports the source of
the more than $227,000 in attorneys fees she paid to her defense
The complaint was filed by Austin attorney Kerry O’Brien, the same
attorney who had previously filed a lawsuit to have her removed from
office, under a provision of Texas law that allows any Texas citizen to
bring such a suit against a public official who is unfit for office. The
specific allegations of the complaint note that Lehmberg’s campaign
finance reports note a $227,885 legal bill due to the Austin-based law
firm Richards, Rodriguez & Skeith, some partial payments on that bill
totaling $16,060, but do not indicate the source of the funds. Lehmberg
has said that she intends to raise contributions to cover the remaining
$211,825 still owed, but has not yet reported any such contributions.
The Texas Ethics Commission has five days to determine if the complaint
against Lehmberg is sufficient to move forward with an investigation.
Breitbart Texas will continue to follow this story.
This post has been updated.
Sarah Elizabeth Rumpf is a political and communications consultant
living in Austin. You can follow her on Twitter at @rumpfshaker.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rushtalk