[Rushtalk] How the GOP plan to loose to Hillary
John A. Quayle
blueoval57 at verizon.net
Sun Jul 19 00:45:34 MDT 2015
At 12:40 PM 7/17/2015, Carl Spitzer wrote:
"Losing" to her would be bad enough, but
"loosing" to her would be unconscionable! =-O
>How the Republicans Plan to Lose to Hillary
>Cliff Kincaid July 16, 2015
>from Univision, the pro-Mexico television
>network, demonstrates the utter folly of
>Republicans appealing to Hispanic voters. It
>finds that 68 percent have a favorable view of
>Hillary Clinton despite the scandals swirling
>around her. By contrast, only 36 percent have a
>favorable view of former Republican Governor Jeb
>Bush, who is married to a Mexican and speaks Spanish.
>Bush was the highest-rated of all the
>Republican candidates, Univision reports, with
>Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), a one-time proponent
>of amnesty for illegals, coming in second with only a 35 percent approval rate.
>What the poll demonstrates is that Hispanics are
>basically owned by the Democratic Party. The
>Democrats power grab for the Latino vote has
>been successful. However, ultimately the
>Democratic Partys success in the presidential
>election depends on convincing Republicans to
>fruitlessly continue to appeal to Hispanics,
>while abandoning the GOP voter base of whites, conservatives and Christians.
>Overall, in terms of political party
>affiliation, 57 percent of Hispanics identified
>themselves as Democrats and only 18 percent said
>they are Republicans. A total of 25 percent called themselves independent.
>In another finding, 59 percent of Hispanic
>voters said they were satisfied with Barack
>Obamas presidency after his six years in
>office. Clearly, most Hispanics have drunk the
>Kool-Aid. For them, it appears that federal
>benefits and legalization of border crossers are
>what matters. Most of them dont bat an eye in
>regard to Obamas lawless and traitorous conduct
>of domestic and foreign policy.
>What the Republicans have left is to try to
>appeal to white, conservative and Christian
>voters. But that strategy, of course, runs the
>obvious risk of being depicted by the liberal
>media as racist. After all, whites are not
>supposed to have a white identity, as
>Taylors book by that name describes.
>Whites cannot have a racial identity, but
>Hispanics and blacks can. This is one aspect of
>political correctness. As communists Bill Ayers
>and Bernardine Dohrn, who are themselves white,
>put it in
>book, it is a race course against white supremacy.
>If Republicans pander to Hispanics, they will
>alienate their voter base, which has shown in
>their reaction to the Donald Trump candidacy
>that they want morenot lessaction taken to
>control the border with Mexico. Republican
>Senator John McCain (AZ) calls the Trump
>supporters crazies, an indication that the GOP
>establishment would rather jettison these people
>than bring them into the Republican camp. Like
>McCain, former GOP presidential candidate Mitt
>Romney has also attacked Trump, saying his
>remarks about criminal aliens are hurting the
>GOP. Its amazing how a loser like Romney, who
>also threw in the towel on gay marriage when he
>was governor of Massachusetts, continues to
>generate press. What he is saying is what the liberal media want to hear.
>Of course, the political correctness which
>dominates the national dialogue and debate also
>means that Republicans like Jeb Bush and Marco
>Rubio are likely to continue to demonize Trump,
>thereby alienating many whites. As a result, the
>Republicans will get less of the conservative
>and Christian vote, further diminishing their
>chances of winning the White House. It will be a
>replay of the losing campaigns of John McCain
>and Mitt Romney. Republicans have already
>alienated many Christian voters by giving up the
>fight for traditional marriage. They had planned
>to abandon border control as an issue until
>Trump and El Chapo got in the way.
>Meanwhile, in another amazing turnaround,
>Republicans on Capitol Hill are backing Obamas
>call for sentencing reform, a strategy that
>will empty the prisons and increase the crime
>rate, thereby alienating GOP voters in favor of law and order.
>As this scenario plays out, Mrs. Clinton is
>coming across on the Democratic side looking
>like a moderate, by virtue of the fact that an
>open socialist, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT),
>is running to her left for the Democratic nomination.
>The Clinton-Sanders show has all the earmarks of
>a carefully staged demonstration of the Marxist
>dialectic, an exercise designed to create the
>appearance of conflict in order to force even
>more radical change on the American people through Democratic Party rule.
>Anybody who knows anything about Hillary, a
>student of Saul Alinsky, understands that her
>moderation is only a façade. Her thesis on
>Alinsky for Wellesley College was titled
>Is Only the Fight
That is the Marxist
>strategy. It is the Alinsky version of the
>Marxist dialectic. It was also adopted by Obama,
>who was trained by Alinsky disciples working
>with the Catholic Church in Chicago.
>In my column,
>Marxism to Understand Hillary, I noted that
>Barbara Olson had come to the conclusion while
>researching her book on Hillary that she has a
>political ideology that has its roots in
>Marxism. Olson noted, In her formative years,
>Marxism was a very important part of her ideology
>This means that Mrs. Clinton understands that
>the Sanders candidacy actually supports and does
>not undermine her own candidacy. It makes
>Hillary look like a moderate while she moves
>further to the left, a place she wants to be, in
>response to the left-wing Democratic base. Only
>the Marxist insiders seem to understand what is happening.
>Some uninformed commentators refer to something
>called Clintonism, a supposed moderate brand
>of Democratic Party politics. If that ever
>existed, it applied to Bill Clinton and not Hillary.
>The fact is that Sanders and Mrs. Clinton have
>associated with the same gang of communists and
>fellow travelers for many years. Sanders was an
>collaborator with the Communist Party-sponsored U.S. Peace Council.
>As for Hillary, Barbara Olson reported in her
>to Pay that Robert Borosage, who served as
>director of the Marxist Institute for Policy
>Studies (IPS), was a colleague and close
>acquaintance of Clinton. Olson wrote that Mrs.
>Clinton operated in the reaches of the left
>including Robert Treuhaft and Jessica Mitford,
>who had been committed Communists and
>Stalinists. Olson said that Hillary worked for
>Treuhaft and paved the way for Mitford to lobby
>then-Governor Bill Clinton on the death penalty issue.
>Olson described Hillary as a budding Leninist
>who understood the Leninist concept of
>acquiring, accumulating and maintaining
>political power at any cost. She wrote that
>Hillary has never repudiated her connection
>with the Communist movement in America or
>explained her relationship with two of its
>leading adherents. Of course, no one has pursued
>these questions with Hillary. She has shown that
>she will not answer hard questions about her
>past, and she has learned that she does not need
>toremarkable in an age when political figures
>are allowed such little privacy.
>Researcher Carl Teichrib has provided me with a
>photo of a Hillary meeting with Cora Weiss from
>the May 2000 edition of Peace Matters, the
>newsletter of the Hague Appeal for Peace. Weiss,
>a major figure in the Institute for Policy
>Studies, gained notoriety for organizing
>anti-Vietnam War demonstrations and traveling to
>Hanoi to meet with communist leaders. In the
>photo, Hillary is shown fawning over a Hague
>Appeal for Peace gold logo pin that Weiss is wearing.
>Teichrib, editor of
>recalls being an observer at the 1999 World
>Federalist Association (WFA) conference, held in
>association with the Hague Appeal for Peace,
>during which everyone in attendance was given an
>honorary membership into the WFA. In addition to
>collaborating with the pro-Hanoi Hague Appeal
>for Peace, the WFA staged a Mission to Moscow
>and held several meetings with the Soviet Peace
>Committee for the purpose of discussing the
>goal of general and complete disarmament and
>the strengthening of the United Nations. Mrs.
>to a WFA conference in a tribute to veteran
>newsman Walter Cronkite, a supporter of world government
>In the WFA booklet, The Genius of Federation:
>Why World Federation is the Answer to Global
>Problems, the group described how a world
>federation, a euphemism for world government,
>could be achieved by advancing step by step
>toward global governance, mostly by enhancing
>the power and authority of U.N. agencies.
>Obamas Iran deal continues this strategy by
>placing enormous power in the hands of the
>U.N.s International Atomic Energy Agency.
>At this stage in the campaign, even before the
>first Republican presidential debate, we can
>already see how the race is playing out. Hillary
>is counting on the Republicans nominating
>another loser with a losing strategy while she
>moves to the left and looks like a moderate.
>Alinsky would be proud.
>Rushtalk mailing list
>Rushtalk at csdco.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Rushtalk