[Rushtalk] How the GOP plan to loose to Hillary

John A. Quayle blueoval57 at verizon.net
Mon Jul 20 12:59:01 MDT 2015


At 12:47 PM 7/20/2015, Steven Laib wrote:
>Hey John,
>Maybe you can get him to answer a vital question 
>for me. What exactly is a Drell?

         Something that rhymes with Bell?!? Mebbe, it's a Texas thing?!?

>They used to play that number at least once a 
>day on a station I used to listen to in SF.  I 
>rarely hear it now  Maybe I should buy it from the apple music store.
>
>SDL
>
>From: John A. Quayle <blueoval57 at verizon.net>
>To: Rushtalk Discussion List 
><rushtalk at csdco.com>; 'Rushtalk Discussion List' <rushtalk at csdco.com>
>Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 11:38 AM
>Subject: Re: [Rushtalk] How the GOP plan to loose to Hillary
>
>At 07:45 AM 7/20/2015, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>>Content-type: multipart/alternative;
>>  boundary="Boundary_(ID_0Jkcw3Ad3ybd1zX6OntdMg)"
>>Content-language: en-us
>>
>>Depends upon exactly what we loosen.
>>
>>What a mess it might be.
>>
>>But remember Archie Bell and the Drells – they 
>>had a song called “The Tighten Up”, might just counter act the loosening.
>
>          Archie's still around, too. He's one 
> of my friends on FACEBOOK, in fact.........-jaq
>
>>
>>From: rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com [ 
>>mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com] On Behalf Of John A. Quayle
>>Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 11:46 PM
>>To: Rushtalk Discussion List; Rushtalk
>>Subject: Re: [Rushtalk] How the GOP plan to loose to Hillary
>>
>>At 12:40 PM 7/17/2015, Carl Spitzer wrote:
>>
>>          "Losing" to her would be bad enough, 
>> but "loosing" to her would be unconscionable! =-O
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>How the Republicans Plan to Lose to Hillary
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Cliff Kincaid  ­   July 16, 2015
>>No 
>>comments   | 
>><http://www.aim.org/aim-column/how-the-republicans-plan-to-lose-to-hillary/print/>Printer 
>>Friendly
>>
>>[]
>>
>><http://twitter.com/share>Tweet
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>A new 
>><http://huelladigital.univisionnoticias.com/the-latin-vote/>survey 
>>from Univision, the pro-Mexico television 
>>network, demonstrates the utter folly of 
>>Republicans appealing to Hispanic voters. It 
>>finds that 68 percent have a favorable view of 
>>Hillary Clinton despite the scandals swirling 
>>around her. By contrast, only 36 percent have a 
>>favorable view of former Republican Governor 
>>Jeb Bush, who is married to a Mexican and speaks Spanish.
>>
>>Bush “was the highest-rated of all the 
>>Republican candidates,” Univision reports, 
>>with Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), a one-time 
>>proponent of amnesty for illegals, coming in 
>>second with only a 35 percent approval rate.
>>
>>What the poll demonstrates is that Hispanics 
>>are basically owned by the Democratic Party. 
>>The Democrats’ power grab for the Latino vote 
>>has been successful. However, ultimately the 
>>Democratic Party’s success in the 
>>presidential election depends on convincing 
>>Republicans to fruitlessly continue to appeal 
>>to Hispanics, while abandoning the GOP voter 
>>base of whites, conservatives and Christians.
>>
>>Overall, in terms of political party 
>>affiliation, 57 percent of Hispanics identified 
>>themselves as Democrats and only 18 percent 
>>said they are Republicans. A total of 25 percent called themselves independent.
>>
>>In another finding, 59 percent of Hispanic 
>>voters said they were satisfied with Barack 
>>Obama’s presidency after his six years in 
>>office. Clearly, most Hispanics have drunk the 
>>Kool-Aid. For them, it appears that federal 
>>benefits and legalization of border crossers 
>>are what matters. Most of them don’t bat an 
>>eye in regard to Obama’s lawless and 
>>traitorous conduct of domestic and foreign policy.
>>
>>What the Republicans have left is to try to 
>>appeal to white, conservative and Christian 
>>voters. But that strategy, of course, runs the 
>>obvious risk of being depicted by the liberal 
>>media as racist. After all, whites are not 
>>supposed to have a “white identity,” as 
>><https://store.amren.com/product/books/white-identity/>Jared 
>>Taylor’s book by that name describes.
>>
>>Whites cannot have a racial identity, but 
>>Hispanics and blacks can. This is one aspect of 
>>political correctness. As communists Bill Ayers 
>>and Bernardine Dohrn, who are themselves white, 
>>put it in 
>><http://www.amazon.com/Race-Course-Against-White-Supremacy/dp/088378291X>their 
>>book, it is a “race course against white supremacy.”
>>
>>If Republicans pander to Hispanics, they will 
>>alienate their voter base, which has shown in 
>>their reaction to the Donald Trump candidacy 
>>that they want more­not less­action taken to 
>>control the border with Mexico. Republican 
>>Senator John McCain (AZ) calls the Trump 
>>supporters “crazies,” an indication that 
>>the GOP establishment would rather jettison 
>>these people than bring them into the 
>>Republican camp. Like McCain, former GOP 
>>presidential candidate Mitt Romney has also 
>>attacked Trump, saying his remarks about 
>>criminal aliens are hurting the GOP. It’s 
>>amazing how a loser like Romney, who also threw 
>>in the towel on gay marriage when he was 
>>governor of Massachusetts, continues to 
>>generate press. What he is saying is what the liberal media want to hear.
>>
>>Of course, the political correctness which 
>>dominates the national dialogue and debate also 
>>means that Republicans like Jeb Bush and Marco 
>>Rubio are likely to continue to demonize Trump, 
>>thereby alienating many whites. As a result, 
>>the Republicans will get less of the 
>>conservative and Christian vote, further 
>>diminishing their chances of winning the White 
>>House. It will be a replay of the losing 
>>campaigns of John McCain and Mitt Romney. 
>>Republicans have already alienated many 
>>Christian voters by giving up the fight for 
>>traditional marriage. They had planned to 
>>abandon border control as an issue until Trump 
>>and “El Chapo” got in the way.
>>
>>Meanwhile, in another amazing turnaround, 
>>Republicans on Capitol Hill are backing 
>>Obama’s call for “sentencing reform,” a 
>>strategy that will empty the prisons and 
>>increase the crime rate, thereby alienating GOP 
>>voters in favor of law and order.
>>
>>As this scenario plays out, Mrs. Clinton is 
>>coming across on the Democratic side looking 
>>like a moderate, by virtue of the fact that an 
>>open socialist, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), 
>>is running “to her left” for the Democratic nomination.
>>
>>The Clinton-Sanders show has all the earmarks 
>>of a carefully staged demonstration of the 
>>Marxist dialectic, an exercise designed to 
>>create the appearance of conflict in order to 
>>force even more radical change on the American 
>>people through Democratic Party rule.
>>
>>Anybody who knows anything about Hillary, a 
>>student of Saul Alinsky, understands that her 
>>“moderation” is only a façade. Her thesis 
>>on Alinsky for Wellesley College was titled 
>>“<http://www.aim.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/hillaryclintonthesis1.pdf> 
>>There Is Only the Fight
” That is the Marxist 
>>strategyy. It is the Alinsky version of the 
>>Marxist dialectic. It was also adopted by 
>>Obama, who was trained by Alinsky disciples 
>>working with the Catholic Church in Chicago.
>>
>>In my column, 
>>“<http://www.aim.org/aim-column/study-marxism-to-understand-hillary/> 
>>Study Marxism to Understand Hillary,” I noted 
>>that Barbara Olson had come to the conclusion 
>>while researching her book on Hillary that 
>>“she has a political ideology that has its 
>>roots in Marxism.” Olson noted, “In her 
>>formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her ideology
”
>>
>>This means that Mrs. Clinton understands that 
>>the Sanders candidacy actually supports and 
>>does not undermine her own candidacy. It makes 
>>Hillary look like a moderate while she moves 
>>further to the left, a place she wants to be, 
>>in response to the left-wing Democratic base. 
>>Only the Marxist insiders seem to understand what is happening.
>>
>>Some uninformed commentators refer to something 
>>called “Clintonism,” a supposed moderate 
>>brand of Democratic Party politics. If that 
>>ever existed, it applied to Bill Clinton and not Hillary.
>>
>>The fact is that Sanders and Mrs. Clinton have 
>>associated with the same gang of communists and 
>>fellow travelers for many years. Sanders was an 
>><http://www.aim.org/aim-column/should-the-nsa-be-watching-senator-sanders/>active 
>>collaborator with the Communist Party-sponsored U.S. Peace Council.
>>
>>As for Hillary, Barbara Olson reported in her 
>>book 
>><http://www.amazon.com/Hell-Pay-Unfolding-Hillary-Clinton/dp/0895261979>Hell 
>>to Pay that Robert Borosage, who served as 
>>director of the Marxist Institute for Policy 
>>Studies (IPS), was “a colleague and close 
>>acquaintance” of Clinton. Olson wrote that 
>>Mrs. Clinton operated in the “reaches of the 
>>left including Robert Treuhaft and Jessica 
>>Mitford,” who had been “committed 
>>Communists” and “Stalinists.” Olson said 
>>that Hillary worked for Treuhaft and paved the 
>>way for Mitford to lobby then-Governor Bill Clinton on the death penalty issue.
>>
>>Olson described Hillary as a “budding 
>>Leninist” who understood the Leninist concept 
>>of acquiring, accumulating and maintaining 
>>political power at any cost. She wrote that 
>>“Hillary has never repudiated her connection 
>>with the Communist movement in America or 
>>explained her relationship with two of its 
>>leading adherents. Of course, no one has 
>>pursued these questions with Hillary. She has 
>>shown that she will not answer hard questions 
>>about her past, and she has learned that she 
>>does not need to­remarkable in an age when 
>>political figures are allowed such little privacy.”
>>
>>Researcher Carl Teichrib has provided me with a 
>>photo of a Hillary meeting with Cora Weiss from 
>>the May 2000 edition of “Peace Matters,” 
>>the newsletter of the Hague Appeal for Peace. 
>>Weiss, a major figure in the Institute for 
>>Policy Studies, gained notoriety for organizing 
>>anti-Vietnam War demonstrations and traveling 
>>to Hanoi to meet with communist leaders. In the 
>>photo, Hillary is shown fawning over a Hague 
>>Appeal for Peace gold logo pin that Weiss is wearing.
>>
>>Teichrib, editor of 
>><http://www.forcingchange.org/>Forcing Change, 
>>recalls being an observer at the 1999 World 
>>Federalist Association (WFA) conference, held 
>>in association with the Hague Appeal for Peace, 
>>during which everyone in attendance was given 
>>an honorary membership into the WFA. In 
>>addition to collaborating with the pro-Hanoi 
>>Hague Appeal for Peace, the WFA staged a 
>>“Mission to Moscow” and held several 
>>meetings with the Soviet Peace Committee for 
>>the purpose of “discussing the goal of 
>>general and complete disarmament” and “the 
>>strengthening of the United Nations.” Mrs. 
>>Clinton 
>><https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM-ZDz89Zg0>spoke 
>>to a WFA conference in a tribute to veteran 
>>newsman Walter Cronkite, a supporter of world government
>>
>>In the WFA booklet, “The Genius of 
>>Federation: Why World Federation is the Answer 
>>to Global Problems,” the group described how 
>>a “world federation,” a euphemism for world 
>>government, could be achieved by advancing 
>>“step by step toward global governance,” 
>>mostly by enhancing the power and authority of U.N. agencies.
>>
>>Obama’s Iran deal continues this strategy by 
>>placing enormous power in the hands of the 
>>U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency.
>>
>>At this stage in the campaign, even before the 
>>first Republican presidential debate, we can 
>>already see how the race is playing out. 
>>Hillary is counting on the Republicans 
>>nominating another loser with a losing strategy 
>>while she moves to the left and looks like a moderate.
>>
>>Alinsky would be proud.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>><http://www.aim.org/aim-column/how-the-republicans-plan-to-lose-to-hillary/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=email071715&utm_medium=email>http://www.aim.org/aim-column/how-the-republicans-plan-to-lose-to-hillary/?utm_source=AIM+-+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=email071715&utm_medium=email 
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Rushtalk mailing list
>><mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>Rushtalk at csdco.com
>>http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>>_______________________________________________
>>Rushtalk mailing list
>>Rushtalk at csdco.com
>><http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk>http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>_______________________________________________
>Rushtalk mailing list
><mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>Rushtalk at csdco.com
>http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Rushtalk mailing list
>Rushtalk at csdco.com
>http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20150720/7f0244a6/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list