[Rushtalk] How the GOP plan to loose to Hillary

John A. Quayle blueoval57 at verizon.net
Mon Jul 20 13:28:54 MDT 2015

At 03:07 PM 7/20/2015, Steven Laib wrote:
>I think it is just something they dreamed up to 
>rhyme with Bell.  It isn't any Texas thing as 
>far as the last ten years has shown me and none 
>of the Texans I asked about it knew.
>Actually, I've made you a minor celeb by telling 
>my colleagues here that you know Archie Bell.

         I also know Robby Parisi (who wrote 
"Play That Funky Music, White Boy") - he's a 
local, I also know Bill Cuomo (who co-wrote "Oh, 
Sherrie" for Steve Perry), Joey Molland (of 
"Badfinger" - remember "No Matter What", "Day 
After Day", and "Baby Blue"?) and I'm really 
close friends with Henry Gross (who wrote and 
sang "Shannon"). A picture of my father is in 
Henry's new video. Take a look: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFmoNlJkLGE

>From: John A. Quayle <blueoval57 at verizon.net>
>To: Rushtalk Discussion List 
><rushtalk at csdco.com>; Rushtalk Discussion List <rushtalk at csdco.com>
>Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 1:59 PM
>Subject: Re: [Rushtalk] How the GOP plan to loose to Hillary
>At 12:47 PM 7/20/2015, Steven Laib wrote:
>>Hey John,
>>Maybe you can get him to answer a vital 
>>question for me. What exactly is a Drell?
>          Something that rhymes with Bell?!? Mebbe, it's a Texas thing?!?
>>They used to play that number at least once a 
>>day on a station I used to listen to in SF.  I 
>>rarely hear it now  Maybe I should buy it from the apple music store.
>>From: John A. Quayle <blueoval57 at verizon.net>
>>To: Rushtalk Discussion List 
>><rushtalk at csdco.com>; 'Rushtalk Discussion List' <rushtalk at csdco.com>
>>Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 11:38 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Rushtalk] How the GOP plan to loose to Hillary
>>At 07:45 AM 7/20/2015, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
>>>Content-type: multipart/alternative;
>>>  boundary="Boundary_(ID_0Jkcw3Ad3ybd1zX6OntdMg)"
>>>Content-language: en-us
>>>Depends upon exactly what we loosen.
>>>What a mess it might be.
>>>But remember Archie Bell and the Drells – they 
>>>had a song called “The Tighten Upâ€, might just counter act the loosening.
>>>          Archie's still around, too. He's one 
>>> of my friends on FACEBOOK, in fact.........-jaq
>>>>From: rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com 
>>>>[<mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com> 
>>>><mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com>mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com] 
>>>>On Behalf Of John A. Quayle
>>>>Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 11:46 PM
>>>>To: Rushtalk Discussion List; Rushtalk
>>>>Subject: Re: [Rushtalk] How the GOP plan to loose to Hillary
>>>>At 12:40 PM 7/17/2015, Carl Spitzer wrote:
>>>>          "Losing" to her would be bad 
>>>> enough, but "loosing" to her would be unconscionable! =-O
>>>>How the Republicans Plan to Lose to Hillary
>>>>Cliff Kincaid  ­   July 16, 2015
>>>>comments   | 
>>>>A new 
>>>>from Univision, the pro-Mexico television 
>>>>network, demonstrates the utter folly of 
>>>>Republicans appealing to Hispanic voters. It 
>>>>finds that 68 percent have a favorable view 
>>>>of Hillary Clinton despite the scandals 
>>>>swirling around her. By contrast, only 36 
>>>>percent have a favorable view of former 
>>>>Republican Governor Jeb Bush, who is married to a Mexican and speaks Spanish.
>>>>Bush “was the highest-rated of all the 
>>>>Republican candididates,†Univision 
>>>>reports, with Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), a 
>>>>one-time proponent of amnesty for illegals, 
>>>>coming in second with only a 35 percent approval rate.
>>>>What the poll demonstrates is that Hispanics 
>>>>are basically owned by the Democratic Party. 
>>>>The Democrats̢۪ power grab for the he 
>>>>Latino vote has been successful. However, 
>>>>ultimately the Democratic Partyâ€ââ„¢s 
>>>>success in the presidential election depends 
>>>>on convincing Republicans to fruitlessly 
>>>>continue to appeal to Hispanics, while 
>>>>abandoning the GOP voter base of whites, conservatives and Christians.
>>>>Overall, in terms of political party 
>>>>affiliation, 57 percent of Hispanics 
>>>>identified themselves as Democrats and only 
>>>>18 percent said they are Republicans. A total 
>>>>of 25 percent called themselves independent.
>>>>In another finding, 59 percent of Hispanic 
>>>>voters said they were satisfied with Barack 
>>>>Obama̢۪s presidency after his ss six years 
>>>>in office. Clearly, most Hispanics have drunk 
>>>>the Kool-Aid. For them, it appears that 
>>>>federal benefits and legalization of border 
>>>>crossers are what matters. Most of them 
>>>>don̢۪t bat an eye in regard to to 
>>>>Obama̢۪s lawless s and traitorous conduct of domestic and foreign policy.
>>>>What the Republicans have left is to try to 
>>>>appeal to white, conservative and Christian 
>>>>voters. But that strategy, of course, runs 
>>>>the obvious risk of being depicted by the 
>>>>liberal media as racist. After all, whites 
>>>>are not supposed to have a “white 
>>>>identity,†€ as 
>>>>Taylor̢۪s book by that name describes.
>>>> > Whites cannot have a racial identity, but 
>>>> Hispanics and blacks can. This is one aspect 
>>>> of political correctness. As communists Bill 
>>>> Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, who are 
>>>> themselves white, put it in 
>>>> <http://www.amazon.com/Race-Course-Against-White-Supremacy/dp/088378291X>their 
>>>> book, it is a “race course against white supremacy.â€
>>>>If Republicans pander to Hispanics, they will 
>>>>alienate their voter base, which has shown in 
>>>>their reaction to the Donald Trump candidacy 
>>>>that they want more­not less­action 
>>>>taken to control the border with Mexico. 
>>>>Republican Senator John McCain (AZ) calls the 
>>>>Trump supporters “crazies,†an 
>>>>indication that the GOP est establishment 
>>>>would rather jettison these people than bring 
>>>>them into the Republican camp. Like McCain, 
>>>>former GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney 
>>>>has also attacked Trump, saying his remarks 
>>>>about criminal aliens are hurting the GOP. 
>>>>It̢۪s amazing how a loser like Romney, who 
>>>>also threwrew in the towel on gay marriage 
>>>>when he was governor of Massachusetts, 
>>>>continues to generate press. What he is 
>>>>saying is what the liberal media want to hear.
>>>>Of course, the political correctness which 
>>>>dominates the national dialogue and debate 
>>>>also means that Republicans like Jeb Bush and 
>>>>Marco Rubio are likely to continue to 
>>>>demonize Trump, thereby alienating many 
>>>>whites. As a result, the Republicans will get 
>>>>less of the conservative and Christian vote, 
>>>>further diminishing their chances of winning 
>>>>the White House. It will be a replay of the 
>>>>losing campaigns of John McCain and Mitt 
>>>>Romney. Republicans have already alienated 
>>>>many Christian voters by giving up the fight 
>>>>for traditional marriage. They had planned to 
>>>>abandon border control as an issue until 
>>>>Trump and “El l Chapo†got in the way.
>>>>Meanwhile, in another amazing turnaround, 
>>>>Republicans on Capitol Hill are backing 
>>>>Obama’s call for “sentensentencing 
>>>>reform,†a strategy that will empty the 
>>>>prisons and increase the crime rate, thereby 
>>>>alienating GOP voters in favor of law and order.
>>>>As this scenario plays out, Mrs. Clinton is 
>>>>coming across on the Democratic side looking 
>>>>like a moderate, by virtue of the fact that 
>>>>an open socialist, Senator Bernie Sanders 
>>>>(I-VT), is running ‬œto her left†for the Democratic nomination.
>>>>The Clinton-Sanders show has all the earmarks 
>>>>of a carefully staged demonstration of the 
>>>>Marxist dialectic, an exercise designed to 
>>>>create the appearance of conflict in order to 
>>>>force even more radical change on the 
>>>>American people through Democratic Party rule.
>>>>Anybody who knows anything about Hillary, a 
>>>>student of Saul Alinsky, understands that her 
>>>>“moderation†is onlyonly a façade. 
>>>>Her thesis on Alinsky for Wellesley College 
>>>>was titled 
>>>>There Is Only the Fight
†That is the 
>>>>Marxist st strategyy. It is the Alinsky 
>>>>version of the Marxist dialectic. It was also 
>>>>adopted by Obama, who was trained by Alinsky 
>>>>disciples working with the Catholic Church in Chicago.
>>>>In my column, 
>>>>Study Marxism to Understand Hillary,†I 
>>>>noted that Barbaara Olson had come to the 
>>>>conclusion while researching her book on 
>>>>Hillary that “she has a political ideology 
>>>>that has its roots in Mararxism.†Olson 
>>>>noted, “In her formative years, Marxism 
>>>>was a very impoportant part of her ideology
>>>> > This means that Mrs. Clinton understands 
>>>> that the Sanders candidacy actually supports 
>>>> and does not undermine her own candidacy. It 
>>>> makes Hillary look like a moderate while she 
>>>> moves further to the left, a place she wants 
>>>> to be, in response to the left-wing 
>>>> Democratic base. Only the Marxist insiders 
>>>> seem to understand what is happening.
>>>>Some uninformed commentators refer to 
>>>>something called â€ÅÅ“Clintonism,†a 
>>>>supposed moderate brand of Democratic Party 
>>>>politics. If that ever existed, it applied to Bill Clinton and not Hillary.
>>>>The fact is that Sanders and Mrs. Clinton 
>>>>have associated with the same gang of 
>>>>communists and fellow travelers for many 
>>>>years. Sanders was an 
>>>>collaborator with the Communist Party-sponsored U.S. Peace Council.
>>>>As for Hillary, Barbara Olson reported in her 
>>>>to Pay that Robert Borosage, who served as 
>>>>director of the Marxist Institute for Policy 
>>>>Studies (IPS), was “a a colleague and 
>>>>close acquaintance†of Clinton. Olson wrote 
>>>>that Mrs. Clintonn operated in the 
>>>>“reaches of the left including Robert 
>>>>Treuhaft a and Jessica Mitford,†who had 
>>>>been “committed Communimunists†and 
>>>>“Stalinists.†¢â‚¬ Olson said that 
>>>>Hillary worked for Treuhaft and paved the way 
>>>>for Mitford to lobby then-Governor Bill Clinton on the death penalty issue.
>>>>Olson described Hillary as a “budding 
>>>>Leninistââ¢â‚¬ who understood the Leninist 
>>>>concept of acquiring, accumulating and 
>>>>maintaining political power at any cost. She 
>>>>wrote that “Hillary has never rerepudiated 
>>>>her connection with the Communist movement in 
>>>>America or explained her relationship with 
>>>>two of its leading adherents. Of course, no 
>>>>one has pursued these questions with Hillary. 
>>>>She has shown that she will not answer hard 
>>>>questions about her past, and she has learned 
>>>>that she does not need to­remarkable in an 
>>>>age when political figures are allowed such little privacy.â€
>>>>Researcher Carl Teichrib has provided me with 
>>>>a photo of a Hillary meeting with Cora Weiss 
>>>>from the May 2000 edition of “P“Peace 
>>>>Matters,†the newsletter of the Hague 
>>>>Appeal for Peace. Weiss, a major figure in 
>>>>the Institute for Policy Studies, gained 
>>>>notoriety for organizing anti-Vietnam War 
>>>>demonstrations and traveling to Hanoi to meet 
>>>>with communist leaders. In the photo, Hillary 
>>>>is shown fawning over a Hague Appeal for 
>>>>Peace gold logo pin that Weiss is wearing.
>>>>Teichrib, editor of 
>>>>Change, recalls being an observer at the 1999 
>>>>World Federalist Association (WFA) 
>>>>conference, held in association with the 
>>>>Hague Appeal for Peace, during which everyone 
>>>>in attendance was given an honorary 
>>>>membership into the WFA. In addition to 
>>>>collaborating with the pro-Hanoi Hague Appeal 
>>>>for Peace, the WFA staged a “Mission to 
>>>>MoMoscow†and held several meetings with 
>>>>the Soviet Peace Committee for the purpose of 
>>>>“discussing the goal of general and 
>>>>complete disarmamenent†and “the he 
>>>>strengthening of the United Nations.†Mrs. 
>>>>to a WFA conference in a tribute to veteran 
>>>>newsman Walter Cronkite, a supporter of world government
>>>>In the WFA booklet, “The Genius of 
>>>>Federation: Why Worlrld Federation is the 
>>>>Answer to Global Problems,†the group 
>>>>described how a Óworld federation,†a 
>>>>euphemism for world government, could be 
>>>>achieeved by advancing “step by step 
>>>>toward global governance,â†mostly by 
>>>>enhancing the power and authority of U.N. agencies.
>>>>Obama̢۪s Iran deal continues this strategy 
>>>>by placinging enormous power in the hands of 
>>>>the U.N.̢۪s International Atomic Energy gy Agency.
>>>>At this stage in the campaign, even before 
>>>>the first Republican presidential debate, we 
>>>>can already see how the race is playing out. 
>>>>Hillary is counting on the Republicans 
>>>>nominating another loser with a losing 
>>>>strategy while she moves to the left and looks like a moderate.
>>>>Alinsky would be proud.
>>>>Rushtalk mailing list
>>>><mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>Rushtalk at csdco.com
>>>>Rushtalk mailing list
>>>>Rushtalk at csdco.com
>>>Rushtalk mailing list
>>><mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>Rushtalk at csdco.com
>>>Rushtalk mailing list
>>>Rushtalk at csdco.com
>>Rushtalk mailing list
>><mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>Rushtalk at csdco.com
>>Rushtalk mailing list
>>Rushtalk at csdco.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20150720/71d09843/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list