[Rushtalk] RINO Marco Rubio: Being Gay Is Not A Choice

Dennis Putnam dap1 at bellsouth.net
Mon May 11 17:56:30 MDT 2015

I think you two are arguing different points. The cause of homosexual
behavior is irrelevant to the issue I am arguing. My objection is
usurping Holy Matrimony (aka marriage) which was established by
religions long before the western hemisphere and even much of the
eastern hemisphere were settled. Not by governments. Using force of law
to change that tradition is a constitutional issue as it violates both
the free exercise clause and freedom of speech clause. I have no
objection to civil unions and extending the same benefits to that as
marriage. However, homosexuals object to that as well which means there
is a hidden agenda different from the purported one.

This is a very slippery slope we are starting down. The exact same
arguments about civil rights to justify changing the millennia old
tradition of marriage can be applied to plural marriages, incestuous
marriage and even bestial marriage. If that doesn't sound like Sodom &
Gomorrah I don't know what does except regardless of religion all will
be force to accept it.

On 5/11/2015 6:46 PM, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
> BFD.  Often, over time, we, as a species, learn.  It’s an ongoing process.
> Sometimes it pays to tenaciously hold onto our beliefs, sometimes
> they’re not quite as right as we want them to be.
> *From:*rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com]
> *On Behalf Of *John A. Quayle
> *Sent:* Monday, May 11, 2015 1:58 PM
> *To:* Rushtalk Discussion List; 'Rushtalk Discussion List'
> *Subject:* Re: [Rushtalk] RINO Marco Rubio: Being Gay Is Not A Choice
> At 11:11 AM 5/10/2015, Stephen A. Frye wrote:
> Content-type: multipart/alternative;
>  boundary="Boundary_(ID_qvVCTih6Y88bieYTKTi2Iw)"
> Content-language: en-us
> */         Somebody ask this fool why there are no gay dogs, cats,
> bulls, cows, sheep, and so forth...................
> Uh, actually there are according to studies done by Canadian biologist
> Dr. Bruce Bagemihl.
> However, in the grand scheme of things it doesn't matter. Homosexual
> behavior is counter productive to reproduction and thus abnormal. If a
> choice then psychiatric help is needed, to which homosexuals strongly
> object. If genetic then research is needed to correct the defect, to
> which homosexuals strongly object. That conundrum by itself tells me
> homosexuals require psychiatric help either way./*
> */
> I agree with you – up to this point.  But there is much in human
> behavior and development that is explained neither by choice nor by
> genetics. The formation of the trillions of neural pathways is one
> example.  There simply aren’t enough DNA pairs to account for that.
> I don’t know what causes homosexuality.  Frankly, I don’t care.  But I
> don’t think, that in the complexities of human life, and vastly
> not-understood human brain, we should limit our thinking to only two
> possibilities./*
>          */Homosexuality was viewed by the AMA as a "mental problem"
> up until the very early 1970s, when the bully homosexual advocates
> began to throw their weight around............
> jaq/*
> _______________________________________________
> Rushtalk mailing list
> Rushtalk at csdco.com
> http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20150511/bc6dcc58/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20150511/bc6dcc58/attachment-0001.bin 

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list