[Rushtalk] George Soros is Not Giving Up

John Quayle blueoval57 at verizon.net
Sun Nov 27 10:59:11 MST 2016

*This evil man is extremely dangerous, and is causing havoc all over the 


*George Soros is Not Giving Up

**Conservative Zone*


Time and time again, Donald Trump and his supporters were chastened by 
Hillary R. Clinton, the mainstream media, the DNC, and left-wing harpies 
not to put up a fight if Hillary should win the election.

“Will you respect the democratic process?” they asked insistently, and 
belligerently- over and over.

Now that Trump has won, democratic voters all over the country are 
engaging in violent protests and riots. *What’s worse, it turns out that 
George Soros is funding the riots*. Not only that- but a petition has 
gone up on change.org asking for the electoral colleges to recast their 
votes- in an unprecedented move that is putting the voters at risk of 
having their victory last Wednesday morning overturned.

*Craigslist Ads have popped up all around the United States calling for 
volunteers to sign up for either “full-time” or “part-time” work as 
“protesters” against Trump’s victory.*

George Soros has been funding demonstrations all over the world in this 
way for years. Recent history is full of indications that these paid-for 
violent groups and all their activities can be traced back to him.

*Our nation is not safe until Donald Trump has taken his rightful place 
in the White House. This is not a time to rest on our laurels.*

Small fires can quickly spread. Protests can easily turn into riots. 
Riots can turn into war zones.

The elite will not go down quietly.

*The George Soros Interview he Doesn’t Want You to See*


Before this presidential election no one outside of Wall Street had ever 
heard of George Soros. He was able to get away with his dirty tricks for 
so long through a series of backdoors and black-op organizations that 
hid his name from public view.

But not anymore. Patriotic Viral News is blowing the lid off this greedy 
billionaire who uses his wealth to manipulate financial markets and 
enact social chaos around the world for his own perverted enjoyment.

*Soros tried to hide this interview he shot with 60 Minutes back in the 
late 90’s, but we found it and posted it for all to see. In the 90’s he 
wanted the fame and celebrity status, but now he wants to hide his name. 
He doesn’t want the American public to know just how dangerous he can be 
to us.*


*George Soros, Elizabeth Warren, Keith Ellison, Nancy Pelosi and More 
Have Closed Door Meetings*



*When George Soros, Elizabeth Warren, Keith Ellison, Nancy Pelosi, and a 
host of very wealthy liberal donors having a closed door meeting, you 
can be assured that something wicked this way comes. **The Democracy 
Alliance is the name of the group and financing liberal action groups is 
the game. The target will be President-Elect Donald Trump’s first one 
hundred days in office. The goal will be to impede him in any way 
possible. They want him to fail and there is no price they will not pay.*

*As Written By Kenneth P. Vogel for POLITICO:*

George Soros and other rich liberals who spent tens of millions of 
dollars trying to elect Hillary Clinton are gathering in Washington for 
a three-day, closed door meeting to retool the big-money left to fight 
back against Donald Trump.

/Full Story Here:/

/Soros bands with donors to resist Trump, ‘take back power’ – POLITICO 

*Dumped files show influence of George Soros on Western politics***

·*Jennifer Oriel <http://www.theaustralian.com.au/author/Jennifer+Oriel>*

·*The Australian*

·*August 22, 2016*



In perhaps the biggest political scandal since WikiLeaks, a group of 
hackers has dumped hundreds of files exposing the influence of socialist 
billionaire George Soros on Western politics.

The files show Soros has established a transnational network that 
pressures governments to adopt high immigration targets and porous 
border policies that could pose a challenge to legitimate state 
sovereignty. His Open Society Foundations target individuals who 
criticise ­Islamism and seek to influence the outcome of national 
elections by undermining Right-leaning politicians. The Australian arm 
of the Soros network is GetUp!.

GetUp! was established by ­activists Jeremy Heimans and David Madden 
with funding from Soros. The Labor-affiliated Construction Forestry 
Mining Energy Union donated $1.1 million to the group. Bill Shorten and 
John Hewson are former board members. A major funder listed on its 
2014-15 Australian Electoral Commission expenditure return is Avaaz, the 
US GetUp! ­affiliate that has received copious amounts of funding from 
Soros networks.

Like most NGOs, GetUp! claims to be independent from political parties. 
Like many NGOs, however, it has close ties to the Left. As Sharri 
Markson ­revealed in this paper, GetUp! chairwoman Sarah Maddison urged 
people to vote for the Greens in the past federal election.

In the wake of the election, GetUp!’s Paul Oosting revealed its campaign 
strategy was to target conservative MPs to reduce their influence. 
Immigration Minister Peter Dutton was a primary GetUp! target. In 
Tasmania, the organisation spent up to $500,000 to unseat Andrew Nikolic 
and forked out $140,000 on campaign advertising alone.

GetUp! has engaged in an ­effective reframing of politics by rebranding 
conservatives as the hard Right while recasting the Left as moderate or 
progressive. Many sections of the media have uncritically adopted 
GetUp!’s rhetoric, which effectively divides the ­Coalition by aligning 
conservatives falsely with a range of hard-Right views that they abhor.

Soros-affiliated organisations follow a well-worn political and 
rhetorical strategy updated for the digital age. Like the socialists and 
communists of old, they attack liberal democracy by delegitimizing the 
classically liberal values of ­individualism, free speech, logical 
argument and public reason. They attack democratic states by advocating 
a porous border policy, ­reframing illegal immigrants as refugees and 
degrading critics of totalitarian tendencies such as ­Islamism in 
orchestrated campaigns of PC censorship. Documents uncovered by Soros 
leaks reveal a pattern of funding for programs that prosecute porous 
borders, mass immigration into the Wes­t nations from Islamist regions, 
and overt campaigns against dissenters. OSF has provided several million 
to the Centre for American Progress, whose programs ­include the 
explicit targeting of free­thinkers critical of Islamism. A recent 
program grant described a strategy to target six critics of ­Islamism 
and the “right-wing media” in an “audit of Islamophobic activities”.

OSF has extended its reach in the European Union through NGO and human 
rights networks. It sought to influence EU elections by thwarting the 
success of candidates it deemed xenophobic or racist. The term 
xenophobic is commonly applied by the Left to politicians who seek 
­rational immigration with a focus on resettlement rather than the 
disastrous porous border policy championed by the EU’s Green-socialist 
bloc. The OSF also funded a range of media projects focused on changing 
how journalists report on politicians and policies cast as xenophobic, 
intolerant or far Right. Leaked documents reveal OSF’s endorsement of 
questionable tactics to achieve its aims. A document ­reviewed by news 
source Breitbart states: “Naming and shaming from us is problematic: we 
are also in the business of channelling money into other countries for 
political purposes.”

It is neither uncommon nor ­illegal for philanthropists to fund 
political advocacy groups and lobby politicians. However, there is an 
ethical line between evidence-based advocacy by NGOs and 
disproportionate influence on the democratic process.

Following the Soros leaks, concerns have been raised about the influence 
of groups claiming to be disinterested third parties and NGOs on core 
Western values such as free speech and government by the people. In one 
of the leaked documents, there appears to be a problematic connection 
­between Soros funding and campaigning against politically incorrect 
media. OSF took credit for funding an advocacy campaign in which a group 
worked to “take away” news anchor Lou Dobbs’s platform on CNN. Dobbs 
resigned from CNN amid controversy over his critical views on 
immigration. I would criticise some of Dobbs’s statements but conform to 
the view that free speech is protected unless an individual or group 
­incites violence or engages in terrorist or treasonous activities.

Another leaked report suggests Soros and OSF played a direct role in 
Barack Obama’s decision to ­increase the US immigration target. Soros 
wrote to Obama to ­request the increase while OSF advocates organised a 
group to act. In its 2015 report, the OSF board stated it took “very 
active efforts … to provide a special allocation of an additional 
100,000 refugee slots for Syrians … In the face of this pressure, the 
Obama administration announced … that by 2017 it would raise to 100,000 
the total number of refugees the US takes worldwide each year.”

While NGOs and human rights groups routinely demand greater governmental 
transparency and accountability, they are rarely required to live up to 
their own standards. A new global transparency group, Transparify, rated 
Soros’s foundations zero for transparency among 200 organisations. 
Ironically, Transparify ­receives funding from OSF.

The belief the NGO sector has been hijacked by interests intent on 
challenging sovereignty to ­destabilise legitimate states is driving 
governments to introduce legislation to neutralise the perceived threat. 
A NGO transparency bill introduced by Israel was condemned by the EU, 
the UN, US Democrats and many human rights organisations. The law 
­demands that NGOs whose primary support comes from foreign political 
entities publicly disclose the fact. Unsurprisingly, many of the NGOs 
exposed by the law were left-wing and human rights organisations that 
challenge ­Israel’s right to sovereign power by attacking its border 
­security policy.

Expect NGOs to continue ­attacking conservative MPs who champion liberal 
democracy by defending Australia’s sovereign border and national 
security policy. It is perhaps time to rewrite the NGO sector’s demand 
for government transparency and accountability as a mutual obligation.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20161127/4042e78a/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list