[Rushtalk] George Soros is Not Giving Up

Tom Matiska tom.matiska at att.net
Mon Nov 28 09:06:12 MST 2016

Soros is almost as old as Castro, and like Castro he will soon stop getting older.  He has less chance than the New York Times of being around for many more election cycles.  Tom 

    On Sunday, November 27, 2016 12:59 PM, John Quayle <blueoval57 at verizon.net> wrote:

 This evil man is extremely dangerous, and is causing havoc all over the world    George Soros is Not Giving Up   
 Conservative Zone    http://www.conservativezone.com/articles/george-soros-is-not-giving-up/    Time and time again, Donald Trump and his supporters were chastened by Hillary R. Clinton, the mainstream media, the DNC, and left-wing harpies not to put  up a fight if Hillary should win the election. “Will you respect the democratic process?” they asked insistently, and belligerently- over and over. Now that Trump has won, democratic voters all over the country are engaging in violent protests and riots. What’s worse, it turns out that George Soros is funding the riots. Not only that- but a petition has gone up on change.org asking for the electoral colleges to recast their votes- in an unprecedented move that is putting the voters at risk of having their victory last Wednesday morning overturned. Craigslist Ads have popped up all around the United States calling for volunteers to sign up for either “full-time” or “part-time” work as “protesters” against Trump’s victory. George Soros has been funding demonstrations all over the world in this way for years. Recent history is full of indications that these paid-for violent groups and all their activities can be traced back to him. Our nation is not safe until Donald Trump has taken his rightful place in the White House. This is not a time to rest on our laurels. Small fires can quickly spread. Protests can easily turn into riots. Riots can turn into war zones. The elite will not go down quietly. The George Soros Interview he Doesn’t Want You to See http://patrioticviralnews.com/articles/the-george-soros-interview-he-doesnt-want-you-to-see/ Before this presidential election no one outside of Wall Street had ever heard of George Soros. He was able to get away with his dirty tricks for so long  through a series of backdoors and black-op organizations that hid his name from public view. But not anymore. Patriotic Viral News is blowing the lid off this greedy billionaire who uses his wealth to manipulate financial markets and enact social  chaos around the world for his own perverted enjoyment. Soros tried to hide this interview he shot with 60 Minutes back in the late 90’s, but we found it and posted it for all to see. In the 90’s he wanted the fame and celebrity status, but now he wants to hide his name. He doesn’t want the American public to know just how dangerous he can be to us.    George Soros, Elizabeth Warren, Keith Ellison, Nancy Pelosi and More Have Closed Door Meetings Conservativebyte.com http://conservativebyte.com/2016/11/george-soros-elizabeth-warren-keith-ellison-nancy-pelosi-and-more-have-closed-door-meetings/    When George Soros, Elizabeth Warren, Keith Ellison, Nancy Pelosi, and a host of very wealthy liberal donors having a closed door meeting, you can be assured that something wicked this way comes. The Democracy Alliance is the name of the group and financing liberal action groups is the game. The target will be President-Elect Donald Trump’s first one hundred days in office. The goal will be to impede him in any way possible. They want him to fail and there is no price they will not pay. As Written By Kenneth P. Vogel for POLITICO: George Soros and other rich liberals who spent tens of millions of dollars trying to elect Hillary Clinton are gathering in Washington for a three-day, closed door meeting to retool the big-money left to fight back against Donald Trump. Full Story Here: Soros bands with donors to resist Trump, ‘take back power’ – POLITICO         Dumped files show influence of George Soros on Western politics ·         Jennifer Oriel ·         The Australian ·         August 22, 2016 ·            ·         ht http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/dumped-files-show-influence-of-george-soros-on-western-politics/news-story/937a225e62420ea3807bd8308b0dad83 In perhaps the biggest political scandal since WikiLeaks, a group of hackers has dumped hundreds of files exposing the influence of socialist billionaire George Soros on Western politics. The files show Soros has established a transnational network that pressures governments to adopt high immigration targets and porous border policies that could pose a challenge to legitimate state sovereignty. His Open Society Foundations target individuals who criticise ­Islamism and seek to  influence the outcome of national elections by undermining Right-leaning politicians. The Australian arm of the Soros network is GetUp!. GetUp! was established by ­activists Jeremy Heimans and David Madden with funding from Soros. The Labor-affiliated Construction Forestry Mining Energy Union donated $1.1 million to the group. Bill Shorten and John Hewson are former board members. A major funder listed on its 2014-15 Australian Electoral Commission expenditure return is Avaaz, the US GetUp! ­affiliate that has received copious amounts of funding from Soros networks. Like most NGOs, GetUp! claims to be independent from political parties. Like many NGOs, however, it has close ties to the Left. As Sharri Markson ­revealed in this paper, GetUp! chairwoman Sarah Maddison urged people to vote for the Greens in the past federal election. In the wake of the election, GetUp!’s Paul Oosting revealed its campaign strategy was to target conservative MPs to reduce their influence. Immigration Minister Peter Dutton was a primary GetUp! target. In Tasmania, the organisation spent up to $500,000 to unseat Andrew Nikolic and forked out  $140,000 on campaign advertising alone. GetUp! has engaged in an ­effective reframing of politics by rebranding conservatives as the hard Right while recasting the Left as moderate or progressive. Many sections of the media have uncritically adopted GetUp!’s rhetoric, which effectively divides the ­Coalition by aligning conservatives  falsely with a range of hard-Right views that they abhor. Soros-affiliated organisations follow a well-worn political and rhetorical strategy updated for the digital age. Like the socialists and communists of old, they attack liberal democracy by delegitimizing the classically liberal values of ­individualism, free speech, logical argument and public  reason. They attack democratic states by advocating a porous border policy, ­reframing illegal immigrants as refugees and degrading critics of totalitarian tendencies such as ­Islamism in orchestrated campaigns of PC censorship. Documents uncovered by Soros leaks reveal a pattern of funding for programs that prosecute porous borders, mass immigration into the Wes­t nations from Islamist regions, and overt campaigns against dissenters. OSF has provided several million to the Centre for American Progress, whose programs ­include the explicit targeting of free­thinkers critical of Islamism. A recent program grant described a strategy to target six critics of ­Islamism and the “right-wing media” in an “audit of Islamophobic activities”. OSF has extended its reach in the European Union through NGO and human rights networks. It sought to influence EU elections by thwarting the success of candidates it deemed xenophobic or racist. The term xenophobic is commonly applied by the Left to politicians who seek ­rational immigration with a focus on resettlement rather than the disastrous porous border policy championed by the EU’s Green-socialist bloc. The OSF also funded a range of media projects focused on changing how journalists report on politicians and policies cast as xenophobic, intolerant or far Right. Leaked documents reveal OSF’s endorsement of questionable tactics to achieve its aims. A document ­reviewed by news source Breitbart states: “Naming and shaming from us is problematic: we are also in the business of channelling money into other countries for political purposes.” It is neither uncommon nor ­illegal for philanthropists to fund political advocacy groups and lobby politicians. However, there is an ethical line between evidence-based advocacy by NGOs and disproportionate influence on the democratic process. Following the Soros leaks, concerns have been raised about the influence of groups claiming to be disinterested third parties and NGOs on core Western values such as free speech and government by the people. In one of the leaked documents, there appears to be a problematic connection ­between Soros funding and campaigning against politically incorrect media. OSF took credit for funding an advocacy campaign in which a group worked to “take away” news anchor Lou Dobbs’s platform on CNN. Dobbs resigned from CNN amid controversy over his critical views on immigration. I would criticise some of Dobbs’s statements but conform to the view that free speech is protected unless an individual or group ­incites violence or engages in terrorist or treasonous activities. Another leaked report suggests Soros and OSF played a direct role in Barack Obama’s decision to ­increase the US immigration target. Soros wrote to Obama to ­request the increase while OSF advocates organised a group to act. In its 2015 report, the OSF board stated it took “very active efforts … to provide a special allocation of an additional 100,000 refugee slots for Syrians … In the face of this pressure, the Obama administration announced … that by 2017 it would raise to 100,000 the total number of refugees the US takes worldwide each year.” While NGOs and human rights groups routinely demand greater governmental transparency and accountability, they are rarely required to live up to their own standards. A new global transparency group, Transparify, rated Soros’s foundations zero for transparency among 200 organisations. Ironically, Transparify ­receives funding from OSF. The belief the NGO sector has been hijacked by interests intent on challenging sovereignty to ­destabilise legitimate states is driving governments to introduce legislation to neutralise the perceived threat. A NGO transparency bill introduced by Israel was condemned by the EU, the UN, US  Democrats and many human rights organisations. The law ­demands that NGOs whose primary support comes from foreign political entities publicly disclose the fact. Unsurprisingly, many of the NGOs exposed by the law were left-wing and human rights organisations that challenge ­Israel’s right to sovereign power by attacking its border ­security policy. Expect NGOs to continue ­attacking conservative MPs who champion liberal democracy by defending Australia’s sovereign border and national security policy. It is perhaps time to rewrite the NGO sector’s demand for government transparency and accountability as a mutual obligation.            
Rushtalk mailing list
Rushtalk at csdco.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20161128/9cc912b7/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list