[Rushtalk] Foreign Payments to Trump Firms Violate Constitution, Suit Will Claim - The New York Times

Carl Spitzer cwsiv at juno.com
Wed Feb 8 08:40:30 MST 2017

Liberals are desparate to make this leap. President Trump still owns
hotels whose rooms are for rent.




The lobby of Trump Tower in New York. China rents space in the building.
Credit Todd Heisler/The New York Times  

WASHINGTON — A team of prominent constitutional scholars, Supreme Court
litigators and former White House ethics lawyers intends to file a
lawsuit Monday morning alleging that President Trump is violating the
Constitution by allowing his hotels and other business operations to
accept payments from foreign governments.

The lawsuit is among a barrage of legal actions against the Trump
administration that have been initiated or are being planned by major
liberal advocacy organizations. Such suits are among the few outlets
they have to challenge the administration now that Republicans are in
control of the government.

In the new case, the lawyers argue that a provision in the Constitution
known as the Emoluments Clause bans payments from foreign powers like
the ones to Mr. Trump’s companies. They cite fears among the framers of
the Constitution that United States officials could be corrupted by
gifts or payments.

The suit, which will not seek any monetary damages, will ask a federal
court in New York to order Mr. Trump to stop taking payments from
foreign government entities. Such payments, it says, include those from
patrons at Trump hotels and golf courses; loans for his office buildings
from certain banks controlled by foreign governments; and leases with
tenants like the Abu Dhabi tourism office, a government enterprise.

Continue reading the main story 

Continue reading the main story 

“The framers of the Constitution were students of history,” said Deepak
Gupta, one of the lawyers behind the suit. “And they understood that one
way a republic could fail is if foreign powers could corrupt our elected


Continue reading the main story 
The president’s son Eric Trump, who is an executive vice president of
the Trump Organization, said the company had taken more steps than
required by law to avoid legal exposure, such as agreeing to donate any
profits collected at Trump-owned hotels that come from foreign
government guests to the United States Treasury.

“This is purely harassment for political gain, and, frankly, I find it
very, very sad,” he said in an interview on Sunday.

The president’s lawyers have argued that the constitutional provision
does not apply to fair-market payments, such as a standard hotel room
bill, and is intended only to prevent federal officials from accepting a
special consideration or gift from a foreign power.

“No one would have thought when the Constitution was written that paying
your hotel bill was an emolument,” one of the lawyers, Sheri A. Dillon,
a partner at Morgan Lewis, said at a news conference this month.

The legal team filing the lawsuit includes Laurence H. Tribe, a Harvard
constitutional scholar; Norman L. Eisen, an Obama administration ethics
lawyer; and Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the law school at the
University of California, Irvine. Among the others are Richard W.
Painter, an ethics counsel in the administration of George W. Bush; Mr.
Gupta, a Supreme Court litigator who has three cases pending before the
court; and Zephyr Teachout, a Fordham University law professor and
former congressional candidate who has been studying and writing about
the Emoluments Clause for nearly a decade.

Ms. Teachout said the one place of potential concern was a nation like
China, which rents space at Trump Tower in New York and is a major
lender to an office building in New York that Mr. Trump controls in

Foreign governments, Ms. Teachout and other ethics expert warn, could
rent out rooms in Trump hotels as a way to send a message to the Trump
family. “If you think other countries are not going to try to leverage
relationships with Trump’s companies to influence trade or military
policy, that is naïve,” she said.

But Andy Grewal, a University of Iowa law school professor, argued in an
academic paper published last week that a payment to a hotel owned by
the Trump family, like the Trump International Hotel in Washington,
would not violate the Emoluments Clause because the money is paid to a
corporate entity and not to Mr. Trump directly.

“There is no connection between the payment and performance of services
by the president personally,” Mr. Grewal said.


Continue reading the main story 
“It would be a lot of fun to watch,” he said of the lawsuit, “but I
imagine it will be kicked out.”

Mr. Eisen said the legal team intended to use the lawsuit to try to get
a copy of Mr. Trump’s federal tax returns, which are needed to properly
assess what income or other payments or loans Mr. Trump has received
from foreign governments.

The plaintiff in the lawsuit is a liberal group known as Citizens for
Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which until recently was
controlled by David Brock, a Democratic Party operative and fervent
supporter of Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Mr. Eisen now serves as chairman of the organization’s board, and Mr.
Painter is vice chairman.

The lawsuit may run into trouble, other legal experts said, given that
CREW, as the organization is known, must demonstrate that it would
suffer direct and concrete injury to give it standing to sue.

The group says it has suffered harm by having to divert resources from
other work to monitor and respond to Mr. Trump’s activities. For
example, the group said, it has answered hundreds of questions from news

In a 1982 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that a civil rights
organization had standing to sue because its use of black “testers” to
see whether landlords and home sellers were abiding by federal law had
hurt its ability to conduct other activities. But in recent decades, and
outside the context of civil rights violations, the court has often been
skeptical of broad assertions of standing.

Regardless of the lawsuit’s fate, it is just the first hint of the legal
assault that the Trump administration will face.

Anthony D. Romero, the executive director of the American Civil
Liberties Union, said it was separately looking for plaintiffs to file a
lawsuit alleging that Mr. Trump is violating the Emoluments Clause. It
hopes to find a hotel or bed-and-breakfast that might compete against a
Trump hotel as a party with standing to sue.


Continue reading the main story 
The A.C.L.U. filed an extensive Freedom of Information Act request on
Thursday asking the Justice Department, the General Services
Administration and the Office of Government Ethics for all legal
opinions and memos they have prepared addressing financial or ethical
conflicts that Mr. Trump might face. It could potentially use those
documents in litigation against the Trump administration.

CREW filed a separate complaint with the General Services Administration
on Friday over a provision that appears to prohibit the leasing of the
Old Post Office building on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington to an
elected federal official. The building is the site of Mr. Trump’s hotel.

Perhaps more important, the legal groups said they might challenge
executive actions Mr. Trump is expected to take on topics like
international trade deals, illegal immigration and climate change.


 ,= ,-_-. =. 
((_/)o o(\_))
 `-'(. .)`-' 

America works when American citizens work.
Freedom and open source the GNU paradigm.

Affordable Wireless Plans
Set up is easy. Get online in minutes.
Starting at only $14.95 per month! 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20170208/441da078/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list