[Rushtalk] Mark Of the Beast?!?

Stephen Frye stephen.frye at outlook.com
Sun Feb 19 09:09:30 MST 2017


I agree that there could be beneficial uses, but the risk of abuse far outweighs any realized or potential benefit.

From: rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com [mailto:rushtalk-bounces at csdco.com] On Behalf Of Dennis Putnam
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 6:26 AM
To: rushtalk at csdco.com
Subject: Re: [Rushtalk] Mark Of the Beast?!?

The mark of the beast raises its ugly head. This was a dire Christian warming a few decades ago.

On 2/18/2017 7:29 PM, John Quayle wrote:
A microchip under my skin? No thank you -- I'll pass

Privacy may be just an illusion, what with Facebook, Google, Amazon and other retailers tracking our spending and viewing habits, and smartphones and local police scanners stalking us everywhere.

But at least they haven't forcefully implanted microchips under our skin .. yet.

You might be surprised to learn what's happening on that front in state legislatures ...

Read the latest now on WND.com.<http://wec.wnd.com/t/419545/3003990/425455/5/>





_______________________________________________

Rushtalk mailing list

Rushtalk at csdco.com<mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>

http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20170219/58416c7d/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list