[Rushtalk] Trump Has Said Nothing About Putin's Satan 2 Video of Nuclear Missiles Aimed at the U.S.

John Quayle blueoval57 at verizon.net
Thu Apr 5 11:49:47 MDT 2018


/*Which brings up another question, did Hillary keep the proceeds? If 
yes, that stockpile was paid for with our taxes. That's 
theft..............*/


On 4/5/2018 12:44 PM, Tom Matiska wrote:
> Not really news.  For 99% of the old fashioned cold war we couldn't 
> reliably shoot down the old ballistic missiles either. Both super 
> powers relied on  "Mutually assured destruction".  Only new wrinkle in 
> the nuclear game is 25 years ago we were worried uranium from a 
> fragmenting USSR would  wind up in the missiles of rogue  states. Now 
> we worry that Russian missiles are armed with uranium care of 
> Hillary's rogue State Dept. ......... Tom
>
>
> On Thursday, April 5, 2018 10:12 AM, Steven Laib <slaib at att.net> wrote:
>
>
> He based his conclusions on the need to eliminate friction. That’s as 
> much as I know.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 8:54 AM, Dennis Putnam <dap1 at bellsouth.net 
> <mailto:dap1 at bellsouth.net>> wrote:
>
> Hmm. I wonder how he knows what the present level of Russian 
> technology is. They are much better at keeping secrets than the US is. 
> They don't have to worry about liberals that will leak secrets, to the 
> detriment of their country, for political gain.
>
> On 4/5/2018 9:07 AM, Steven Laib wrote:
> That’s his point. I said it badly. Impossible with the present level 
> of technology
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 7:40 AM, Dennis Putnam <dap1 at bellsouth.net 
> <mailto:dap1 at bellsouth.net>> wrote:
>
> Nothing in the laws of physics would make that impossible. I would 
> question your friend's credentials. Just because the technology does 
> not exist yet to generate the force required does not make it 
> impossible. It just makes it unknown.
>
> On 4/4/2018 9:25 PM, Steven Laib wrote:
> And do we know that Putin is not just spouting propaganda ?
> I heard awhile back that they are supposed to have a hypersonic 
> underwater torpedo, which a friend with credentials in physics says is 
> impossible.
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Carl Spitzer {C Juno} <cwsiv at juno.com 
> <mailto:cwsiv at juno.com>> wrote:
>
> *Trump Has Said Nothing About Putin's Satan 2 Video of Nuclear 
> Missiles Aimed at the U.S.* By Graham Lanktree 
> <http://www.newsweek.com/authors/graham-lanktree> On 3/2/18 at 7:48 AM
> Share U.S. <http://www.newsweek.com/us> Donald Trump 
> <http://www.newsweekcom/topic/donald-trump> Russia investigation 
> <http://www.newsweek.com/topic/russia-investigation> Vladimir Putin 
> <http://www.newsweek.com/topic/vladimir-putin> President Donald 
> Trump’s silence in the face of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s 
> unveiling of the Kremlin’s new Satan 2 nuclear missile, and a video 
> showing it targeting the U.S., is “scary,” said a former American 
> ambassador to Moscow.
>
> Putin unveiled a new hypersonic intercontinental ballistic 
> missile—which cannot be shot down by antimissile systems—Thursday 
> during his annual address to Russia’s Federal Assembly in Moscow.
>
> Other countries listen to Russia only when it comes out with new 
> weapons, Putin said, adding, “You will listen to us now.” He showed a 
> video of nuclear missiles raining 
> <https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/mar/01/putin-nuclear-missiles-tampa-bay-florida> 
> down on what appeared to be Florida’s Tampa Bay area, home of the U.S. 
> military’s Central Command.
>
> 03_02_TrumpRussia In the wake of the Florida school shootings, 
> President Donald Trump meets with bipartisan members of Congress at 
> the White House to discuss school and community safety, on February 
> 28. Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
>
>
> “A Kremlin leader announced today several new nuclear weapon systems 
> designed to attack America in novel, scary ways, and our commander in 
> chief (unless I missed it?) did not say one word in response. 
> Amazing,” wrote Michael McFaul, U.S. ambassador to Moscow under 
> President Barack Obama.
>
> McFaul wrote that “even 10 years ago, Putin's speech today threatening 
> to attack America in new ways with nuclear weapons would have been 
> sensational news, demanding a response from our president.
>
> “Today? Nothing. Amazing. Disappointing. And scary,” he wrote.
>
> Keep up with this story and more 
> <https://subscription.newsweek.com/subscribe?utm_source=NWwebsite&utm_campaign=subscribe&utm_medium=in-article-daily#12months>by 
> subscribing now 
> <https://subscription.newsweek.com/subscribe?utm_source=NWwebsite&utm_campaign=subscribe&utm_medium=in-article-daily#12months>
>
>
> While the U.S. shouldn’t discount “all that Putin said on nukes,” 
> tweeted <https://twitter.com/steven_pifer/status/969257980679028736> 
> Steven Pifer, a former foreign service diplomat in Moscow and U.S. 
> ambassador to Ukraine, the message was “aimed first & foremost at 
> #Russian public.”
>
> *Related: Satan 2: Putin Tells U.S. “You Will Listen to Us Now” as He 
> Deploys Hypersonic Nuclear ICBM 
> <http://www.newsweek.com/satan-2-russia-deploys-new-hypersonic-icbm-putin-says-it-can-nuke-anywhere-us-825395>*
>
> Last month, special counsel Robert Mueller indicted several Russians 
> linked to the Kremlin for waging “information warfare” on the U.S. 
> during the 2016 election. Trump’s campaign is being investigated by 
> Mueller following allegations that it aided Russia. The president has 
> come under sharp criticism for not implementing the further sanctions 
> against Russian intelligence and military enacted by Congress last year.
>
> Last month, American intelligence officials told 
> <http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1802/20/ebo.01.html> Congress that 
> Trump had not given them instructions to stop or blunt Russian 
> information warfare. Trump’s National Security Agency Director Admiral 
> Mike Rogers reiterated 
> <http://www.newsweekcom/sarah-sanders-blames-obama-russian-interference-823547> 
> that during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing Tuesday.
>
> Trump did not mention the video or Russia’s new missiles in several 
> early-morning tweets that took aim, variously, at actor Alec Baldwin 
> and criticism of the president’s decision on Thursday to enact severe 
> tariffs on steel and aluminum.
>
> The president has expressed little public criticism of Putin since the 
> 2016 election campaign and his inauguration, even at times defending 
> Russia’s authoritarian leader.
>
> “We’re not going to react to every word or idea that world leaders 
> express,” said State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert when asked 
> about Russia’s weapons by reporters in a briefing Thursday.
>
> “It was certainly unfortunate to have watched the video animation that 
> depicted a nuclear attack on the United States,” she said. “We don’t 
> regard that as the behavior of a responsible international player.”
>
> When asked about the White House reaction to Putin’s speech, Trump’s 
> press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the president “understands 
> the threats facing America and our allies in this century, and is 
> determined to protect our homeland and preserve peace through strength.”
>
> Sanders said Russia is developing weapons “in direct violations of its 
> treaty obligations,” and pointed out that the administration has 
> undertaken a Nuclear Posture Review to “modernize our nuclear arsenal 
> and ensure our capabilities are unmatched.”
>
>
>
>
> http://www.newsweek.com/trump-has-said-nothing-about-putins-satan-2-video-nuclear-missiles-aimed-us-827910
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> *Doctor Warns: Stop Eating This Vegetable Immediately*
> Gundry MD
> <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5ac4fa61473f37a603a37st02vuc>http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5ac4fa61473f37a603a37st02vuc
> SponsoredBy Content.Ad
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rushtalk mailing list
>> Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>> http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rushtalk mailing list
> Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
> http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rushtalk mailing list
>> Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>> http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rushtalk mailing list
> Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
> http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rushtalk mailing list
>> Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
>> http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk
> _______________________________________________
> Rushtalk mailing list
> Rushtalk at csdco.com <mailto:Rushtalk at csdco.com>
> http://kalos.csdcocom/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk 
> <http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rushtalk mailing list
> Rushtalk at csdco.com
> http://kalos.csdco.com/mailman/listinfo/rushtalk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20180405/7951ed6d/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list