[Rushtalk] FBI and sheriff either failed miserably Parkland Shooting . . .or much worse

Carl Spitzer cwsiv at juno.com
Wed Feb 28 12:07:34 MST 2018

Published: Feb 27, 2018
Author: Via The Daily Bell

We’re supposed to trust the government to keep us safe. But the two main
law enforcement units that should have protected students against the
Parkland shooter failed miserably.

The shooter was handed to the Broward County Sheriff’s office and the
FBI on a silver platter multiple times. There were tips that
specifically mentioned school shootings. There were threats made by the
shooter, which again, specifically mentioned school shootings.

There were calls about violence, including the shooter putting guns to
people’s heads. Deputies visited many times after concerned friends,
family, and strangers called. The suspect once called the police on

Then a sheriff’s deputy failed again by refusing to go into the school
during the shooting and engage the shooter. He was on the scene. He knew
what was happening. And he shirked his duty.

These are the people who will protect us if we are disarmed.

The old cliché is that when seconds count, police are just minutes away.
And even then they might not help you. These law enforcement show
exactly why we can not give up our personal ability to defend ourselves
and our loved ones, in favor of government agencies.

The Worst of Politics

Sheriff Scott Israel’s department mishandled the numerous alerts about
the shooter. He hired the deputy who cowered outside rather than
confront the shooter. Now four other deputies are reported to have
arrived on the scene while the shooting was ongoing, and likewise did
not intervene.

Scott Israel wants to blame the NRA when it was his department that
failed to prevent and then failed to stop this shooting. Why is he being
paraded around the news as if his opinion on guns matters? He is the
poster child for why you should never have to depend on law enforcement.

This man is a typical politician. In fact, he was on the Florida
Leadership Council of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential Campaign.

Scott Israel is the epitome of a political schmuck. He was a Republican
but ran for Sheriff as a Democrat when that seemed like a better way to
get elected. He shows us that political parties are two arms of the same

Once he got elected, he hired his campaign manager’s husband as an
“outreach manager” for the Sheriff’s Department, which pays almost
$80,000 a year. In total, Israel handed out almost $400,000 in publicly
funded salaries to political supporters. These “public outreach” jobs
are responsible for social media posts and other pro-department
propaganda. They form a tax- payer funded re-election arm of the
Sheriff’s office.

Israel still complained that he didn’t have the funding to keep a murder
suspect from escaping the county courthouse in 2016. But he did have the
funding to hire political supporters. Maybe that is why the deputy on
the scene was more equipped to campaign for office than provide public

The shooter made actual threats. He reportedly put guns to people’s
heads multiple times. Those are actual crimes which if charged and
convicted, would have disqualified him from legally purchasing a

Subjectively “crazy” people or gun obsessed people should obviously not
be involuntarily committed, or stripped of their rights. But this
shooter victimized people. He threatened violence against other people.
He had violent altercations which were never followed up with criminal
charges. That is not the same as arbitrarily restricting anyone labeled
mentally ill from legally owning guns.

Scott Israel’s politicized department dropped the ball on addressing
actual criminal activity of someone who went on to do much worse.

But instead of addressing the utter failure of the law enforcement, some
people want to make sure they are the only ones equipt to handle threats
like these. That is insanity. The shooter would have already been barred
from owning guns if law enforcement had done their jobs.

But Sheriff Scott Israel was too busy quoting villains from Game of
Thrones, to demonstrate the point that he didn’t care what the public
had to say about his corrupt hiring practices.

The Sketchy FBI is Always Lurking

On January 5, just a month before the shooting, a woman who knew [the
shooter] called the FBI tip line and said ‘I know he’s going to explode.
‘She said her biggest fear was that he might resort to entering a school
and just start ‘shooting the place up.’

One month before the shooting, the FBI gets this warning. They had
already been tipped off to an online comment from someone with the same
name who described himself as a school shooter. Authorities had also
previously been told by a neighbor that the shooter talked on Instagram
about plans to shoot up his school.

So is this a case of FBI incompetence? They utterly failed to address
the threat. They could have made a couple phone calls to local
authorities and found out this was someone worth looking into.

Or Worse… maybe they did make some calls.

The FBI routinely grooms people to become attempted-terrorists. The when
they thwart the attempted attack, which they helped plan, they can say,
look, we stopped a terrorist attack!

First, they identify someone who already holds radical views. A good
candidate is someone who would be easily influenced, and generally has
some sort of mental deficiency. They go for someone that is a bit crazy,
but would not necessarily want to, or be able to, become a terrorist.

Then the FBI uses an undercover agent or informant to radicalize the
target, feed into their paranoia, and eventually pitch the idea of a
terrorist attack. Sometimes they even offer them money to participate.
The FBI then provides them with fake explosives and arrests them at the
scene of the alleged plot.

Of course, the planned attacks would have never materialized without FBI
agents radicalizing a subject, planning the attack, and providing the
subject with fake explosives. This is not a conspiracy theory, it is
well documented that a majority of the terrorist attacks the FBI thwarts
are actually entrapment operations.

Is it so much of a stretch to think they would radicalize someone for
political purposes, and then just let a tragedy happen?

We know that the FBI will pursue investigations for political purposes.
We know that they will harass citizens and hide evidence for political
purposes. The entire history of the FBI is marred by corruption and
overreach. And there is compelling evidence, including the outcome of a
civil trial in U.S. courts, to suggest that the FBI may have had a hand
in the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.

What Could Have Happened

I’m not saying this is what happened. All I am saying is that the
following would meet the FISA court’s standard of evidence to
investigate further.

We have the FBI who was contacted at least twice about the shooter and
did not follow protocol. We have a Sheriff’s department who never
charged the shooter with a crime despite dozens of incidents. We have a
politically motivated Sheriff running that department, who has met
Hillary Clinton on numerous occasions and volunteered in a leadership
position on her 2016 campaign.

Then after the shooting, the media trots out the victims in a
coordinated campaign for gun control. Sheriff Scott Israel takes part in
throwing blame on guns and the NRA.

[Refer to the post last week about how to spot “fake news” and
propaganda. If something in the media seems coordinated, it is.]

And the champion of their gun control efforts is David Hogg, the son of
a former FBI agent. He quickly becomes an activist, not just for gun
control, but commenting on all sorts of political issues. He is against
Trump, against the NRA, but happens to support Sheriff Israel, despite
the blatant failures of his department.

He also doesn’t want to blame the FBI for botching the tips they
received. After all, he has seen how hard his dad worked. And the media
provided supplemental information about his dad. He used to collect
teddy bears and hand them out to refugee children–seriously.

We know the FBI has a contingent of Clinton supporters and relied on the
Clinton Campaign for some information they presented to the FISA court
against Trump allies.

The only way the shooter was not on the FBI’s radar is if they were
grossly incompetent. He was definitely known well by Sheriff Israel and
his deputies. But why wasn’t he ever arrested and charged for his many
crimes of violence?

It is possible the FBI did look into the shooter and decided he was a
good candidate for one of their usual operations. They could have teamed
up with Israel’s sheriff’s department to make sure they didn’t place any
roadblocks in the way–like criminal charges–to the shooter eventually
shooting up the school.

We don’t know who the shooter was talking to online, but it would be
easy for an FBI agent to encourage his violence, and nudge him towards
committing the act. The shooter would never know himself that he was
being nudged towards action by an undercover agent.

They had the infrastructure and supporters in place in order to take
control of the narrative directly after the shooting. Sheriff Israel
gets national exposure–he probably didn’t see this backfiring on him,
because the public isn’t supposed to question victims or anyone that
speaks for them. And another FBI agent gets to give his son some media
attention, and kickstart his career in activist journalism.

The Deep State/ Clinton Crime Family get to push their gun control
agenda. They also get to criticize Trump and his NRA supporters for
being (relatively) pro-gun. And finally, the shooting distracts from the
mounting accusations against FBI corruption and collusion with the
Clinton Campaign.

I don’t think David Hoggs is a crisis actor. I don’t think the shooting
was faked. I think the alleged shooter is the real shooter.

And I am not even convinced the FBI necessarily purposely ignored the
warning signs, or further encouraged the shooter in some way.

All I am saying is that there is enough weird stuff going on to question
it. With this amount of strange connections and the coordinated media
response, people questioning the official story should not be shamed and

The Right to Question

Governments have done horrible things before. Read any history book. It
is full of murderous plots, and traitorous deceits.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff even suggested a false flag called Operation
Northwood to President Kennedy, who vehemently objected. And we know
what happened to him.

We also know the media has long been in the pocket of the Deep State,
starting with Operation Mockingbird. They hired journalists and
broadcasters to parrot CIA lies.

I am not claiming with any authority that some kind of conspiracy
happened at Parkland. But I am not just going to sit back and accept the
government’s and mainstream media’s narrative of what happened,
especially when they are clearly pushing an agenda based on the tragedy.

All I am saying is that when something looks sketchy, people should not
be bullied into not talking about it. Unfortunately, most of the
information that would enlighten us is safeguarded by the most suspect
people, like the FBI and Sheriff Israel.

Every avenue should be explored. It is right to be critical and
distrustful of the government. They are corrupt. They lie. And they will
go to great lengths to control you.

All this being said, it is important not to let the government control
your mind. They depend on your fear.

You don’t have to play by the rules of the corrupt politicians,
manipulative media, and brainwashed peers. 


 ,= ,-_-. =. 
((_/)o o(\_))
 `-'(. .)`-' 

America works when American citizens work.
Freedom and open source the GNU paradigm.
Constant Fatigue Is A Warning Sign – See The Simple Fix
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kalos.csdco.com/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20180228/d306fbf9/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list