[Rushtalk] Liberals, You’re Not as Smart as You Think

Rushtalk Discussion List rushtalk at csdco.com
Fri May 1 10:47:38 MDT 2020


Liberals, You’re Not as Smart as You Think
By Gerard Alexander

Mr. Alexander is a professor of political science at the University of
Virginia.


        
      * May 12, 2018 


Credit...Illustration by Alvaro Dominguez; Photographs by ZargonDesign/E
+, via Getty Images, and Renaud Philippe/EyeEm, via Getty Images

I know many liberals, and two of them really are my best friends.
Liberals make good movies and television shows. Their idealism has been
an inspiration for me and many others. Many liberals are very smart. But
they are not as smart, or as persuasive, as they think.


And a backlash against liberals — a backlash that most liberals don’t
seem to realize they’re causing — is going to get President Trump
re-elected.


People often vote against things instead of voting for them: against
ideas, candidates and parties. Democrats, like Republicans, appreciate
this whenever they portray their opponents as negatively as possible.
But members of political tribes seem to have trouble recognizing that
they, too, can push people away and energize them to vote for the other
side. Nowhere is this more on display today than in liberal control of
the commanding heights of American culture.


Take the past few weeks. At the White House Correspondents’ Association
dinner in Washington, the comedian Michelle Wolf landed some punch lines
that were funny and some that weren’t. But people reacted less to her
talent and more to the liberal politics that she personified. For every
viewer who loved her Trump bashing, there seemed to be at least one
other put off by the one-sidedness of her routine. Then, when Kanye West
publicly rethought his ideological commitments, prominent liberals
criticized him for speaking on the topic at all. Maxine Waters, a
Democratic congresswoman from California, remarked that “sometimes Kanye
West talks out of turn” and should “maybe not have so much to say.”


Liberals dominate the entertainment industry, many of the most
influential news sources and America’s universities. This means that
people with progressive leanings are everywhere in the public eye — and
are also on the college campuses attended by many people’s children or
grandkids. These platforms come with a lot of power to express values,
confer credibility and celebrity and start national conversations that
others really can’t ignore.


But this makes liberals feel more powerful than they are. Or, more
accurately, this kind of power is double-edged. Liberals often don’t
realize how provocative or inflammatory they can be. In exercising their
power, they regularly not only persuade and attract but also annoy and
repel.


[Receive the day’s most urgent debates right in your inbox by
subscribing to the Opinion Today newsletter.]



In fact, liberals may be more effective at causing resentment than in
getting people to come their way. I’m not talking about the possibility
that jokes at the 2011 correspondents’ association dinner may have
pushed Mr. Trump to run for president to begin with. I mean that the
“army of comedy” that Michael Moore thought would bring Mr. Trump down
will instead be what builds him up in the minds of millions of voters.


Consider some ways liberals have used their cultural prominence in
recent years. They have rightly become more sensitive to racism and
sexism in American society. News reports, academic commentary and movies
now regularly relate accounts of racism in American history and condemn
racial bigotry. These exercises in consciousness-raising and criticism
have surely nudged some Americans to rethink their views, and to reflect
more deeply on the status and experience of women and members of
minority groups in this country.


But accusers can paint with very wide brushes. Racist is pretty much the
most damning label that can be slapped on anyone in America today, which
means it should be applied firmly and carefully. Yet some people have
cavalierly leveled the charge against huge numbers of Americans —
specifically, the more than 60 million people who voted for Mr. Trump.


In their ranks are people who sincerely consider themselves not bigoted,
who might be open to reconsidering ways they have done things for years,
but who are likely to be put off if they feel smeared before that
conversation even takes place.


It doesn’t help that our cultural mores are changing rapidly, and we
rarely stop to consider this. Some liberals have gotten far out ahead of
their fellow Americans but are nonetheless quick to criticize those who
haven’t caught up with them.


Within just a few years, many liberals went from starting to talk about
microaggressions to suggesting that it is racist even to question
whether microaggressions are that important. “Gender identity disorder”
was considered a form of mental illness until recently, but today anyone
hesitant about transgender women using the ladies’ room is labeled a
bigot. Liberals denounce “cultural appropriation” without, in many
cases, doing the work of persuading people that there is anything wrong
with, say, a teenager not of Chinese descent wearing a Chinese-style
dress to prom or eating at a burrito cart run by two non-Latino women.


Pressing a political view from the Oscar stage, declaring a conservative
campus speaker unacceptable, flatly categorizing huge segments of the
country as misguided — these reveal a tremendous intellectual and moral
self-confidence that smacks of superiority. It’s one thing to police
your own language and a very different one to police other people’s. The
former can set an example. The latter is domineering.


This judgmental tendency became stronger during the administration of
President Barack Obama, though not necessarily because of anything Mr.
Obama did. Feeling increasingly emboldened, liberals were more convinced
than ever that conservatives were their intellectual and even moral
inferiors. Discourses and theories once confined to academia were
transmitted into workaday liberal political thinking, and college
campuses — which many take to be what a world run by liberals would look
like — seemed increasingly intolerant of free inquiry.


It was during these years that the University of California included the
phrase “America is the land of opportunity” on a list of discouraged
microaggressions. Liberal politicians portrayed conservative positions
on immigration reform as presumptively racist; Nancy Pelosi, the House
minority leader, once dubiously claimed that she had heard Republicans
tell Irish visitors that “if it was you,” then immigration reform “would
be easy.”


When Mr. Obama remarked, behind closed doors, during the presidential
campaign in 2008, that Rust Belt voters “get bitter, they cling to guns
or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them,” it mattered
not so much because he said it but because so many listeners figured
that he was only saying what liberals were really thinking.


These are the sorts of events conservatives think of when they sometimes
say, “Obama caused Trump.” Many liberals might interpret that phrase to
mean that America’s first black president brought out the worst in some
people. In this view, not only might liberals be unable to avoid
provoking bigots, it’s not clear they should even try. After all, should
they not have nominated and elected Mr. Obama? Should they regret doing
the right thing just because it provoked the worst instincts in some
people?


This is a limited view of the situation. Even if liberals think their
opponents are backward, they don’t have to gratuitously drive people
away, including voters who cast ballots once or even twice for Mr. Obama
before supporting Mr. Trump in 2016.


Champions of inclusion can watch what they say and explain what they’re
doing without presuming to regulate what words come out of other
people’s mouths. Campus activists can allow invited visitors to speak
and then, after that event, hold a teach-in discussing what they
disagree with. After the Supreme Court ruled in 2015 that states had to
allow same-sex marriage, the fight, in some quarters, turned to pizza
places unwilling to cater such weddings. Maybe don’t pick that fight?


People determined to stand against racism can raise concerns about
groups that espouse hate and problems like the racial achievement gap in
schools without smearing huge numbers of Americans, many of whom might
otherwise be Democrats by temperament.


Liberals can act as if they’re not so certain — and maybe actually not
be so certain — that bigotry motivates people who disagree with them on
issues like immigration. Without sacrificing their principles, liberals
can come across as more respectful of others. Self-righteousness is
rarely attractive, and even more rarely rewarded.


Self-righteousness can also get things wrong. Especially with the
possibility of Mr. Trump’s re-election, many liberals seem primed to
write off nearly half the country as irredeemable. Admittedly, the
president doesn’t make it easy. As a candidate, Mr. Trump made
derogatory comments about Mexicans, and as president described some
African countries with a vulgar epithet. But it is an unjustified leap
to conclude that anyone who supports him in any way is racist, just as
it would be a leap to say that anyone who supported Hillary Clinton was
racist because she once made veiled references to “superpredators.”


Liberals are trapped in a self-reinforcing cycle. When they use their
positions in American culture to lecture, judge and disdain, they push
more people into an opposing coalition that liberals are increasingly
prone to think of as deplorable. That only validates their own worst
prejudices about the other America.


Those prejudices will be validated even more if Mr. Trump wins
re-election in 2020, especially if he wins a popular majority. That’s
not impossible: The president’s current approval ratings are at 42
percent, up from just a few months ago.


Liberals are inadvertently making that outcome more likely. It’s not too
late to stop.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/12/opinion/sunday/liberals-youre-not-as-smart-as-you-think-you-are.html




____________________________________________________________
Sponsored by https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part&utm_medium=uol&utm_campaign=rss_taglines_more

Bill Gates Offers His Own Time Range for Vaccine
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/5eac52cca58e552cb7c4est04duc1
Biden Goes on the Record About Tara Reade Accusation
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/5eac52ccc844e52cb7c4est04duc2
Unfazed Governor Extends Michigan's State of Emergency
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/5eac52cceab0a52cb7c4est04duc3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://galene.csd.net/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20200501/ff467cbe/attachment.html>


More information about the Rushtalk mailing list