[Rushtalk] Censorship of real Science

Carl Spitzer {C Juno} cwsiv at juno.com
Sat Aug 7 13:27:50 MDT 2021

On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 19:15 +0000, John A. Quayle via Rushtalk wrote:

> From: Eric <erii
> Why is science being censored in Canada? I thought you claimed 
> socialists believe in the science.
> Any claim against the current government approved propaganda gets 
> heavily censored and/or the person questioning the official
> propaganda 
> gets slandered or libeled.
> Scientist in Canada gets slandered and censored for simply stating
> facts 
> about the vaccine.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0DIF3ZLAkg
> There are concerns with the vaccine. Why can not people see that? 
> Accusing any non vaccinated person for causing other people to die
> from 
> the virus should be a crime. It is libel or slander depending on how
> you 
> present it. Coercing someone to get the vaccine should be a crime.
>                     Mandatory vaccinations are a violation of the
> Geneva Convention. Look it up!



The ten points of the Nuremberg Code
The ten points of the code were given in the section of the judges'
verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments":[6]

             1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely
                essential. This means that the person involved should
                have legal capacity to give consent; should be so
                situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice,
                without the intervention of any element of force, fraud,
                deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of
                constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient
                knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the
                subject matter involved as to enable him to make an
                understanding and enlightened decision. This latter
                element requires that before the acceptance of an
                affirmative decision by the experimental subject there
                should be made known to him the nature, duration, and
                purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which
                it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards
                reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his
                health or person which may possibly come from his
                participation in the experiment. The duty and
                responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the
                consent rests upon each individual who initiates,
                directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal
                duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to
                another with impunity.[13]
             2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful
                results for the good of society, unprocurable by other
                methods or means of study, and not random and
                unnecessary in nature.
             3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the
                results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the
                natural history of the disease or other problem under
                study that the anticipated results will justify the
                performance of the experiment.
             4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all
                unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
             5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a
                priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury
                will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where
                the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
             6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that
                determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem
                to be solved by the experiment.
             7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate
                facilities provided to protect the experimental subject
                against even remote possibilities of injury, disability,
                or death.
             8. The experiment should be conducted only by
                scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of
                skill and care should be required through all stages of
                the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the
             9. During the course of the experiment the human subject
                should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end
                if he has reached the physical or mental state where
                continuation of the experiment seems to him to be
            10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in
                charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at
                any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the
                exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful
                judgment required of him that a continuation of the
                experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or
                death to the experimental subject.

Sponsored by https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part&utm_medium=uol&utm_campaign=rss_taglines_more

Homeland Security Warns of Threat from Trump Conspiracy
Newest Olympic Medalist Has a Famous Dad
Writer's 20-Year Worry: 'Did I Kill the Segway?'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://galene.csd.net/pipermail/rushtalk/attachments/20210807/a068229e/attachment.html>

More information about the Rushtalk mailing list